evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Maternity Capital — Russia's Cash-for-Births Policy and Its Gender-Equality Blind Spot

Russia · Moscow · See the Russia profile · See the Moscow profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 85% 26/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Since 2007, Russia's 'maternity capital' grant (now ~737,000 rubles) raised long-run fertility by ~0.15 children per woman, but peer-reviewed and feminist research find it reinforces women's caregiver role, not workplace equality.

0.15 children per woman
Estimated long-run increase in fertility attributable to the policy
737,204 rubles
Maternity capital benefit amount for a first child (from February 2026)

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Pension Fund of Russia (since 2023: Social Fund of Russia)
Period
2007-present (extended to 2030)
Keywords
family policy, cash transfers, pronatalism, gender-equality research

Context

Since 2007 the Russian government has paid a lump-sum 'maternity capital' benefit to mothers on the birth of a second child, extended to first children from 2020. Administered by the Pension Fund of Russia (merged into the Social Fund of Russia in 2023), the programme has been extended through 2030, with the benefit reaching roughly 737,204 rubles for a first child from February 2026.

Results

Slonimczyk and Yurko (2014, Labour Economics) estimate a structural dynamic model of fertility and employment on Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey panel data and find the policy raised long-run fertility by about 0.15 children per woman. Feminist and demographic scholars, notably Rivkin-Fish writing in Slavic Review, argue the policy channels support through mothers as primary caregivers and does not challenge the gendered division of paid and unpaid labour.

Conclusions

The programme is a durable, rigorously studied and politically popular family policy that meaningfully changed fertility behaviour, but the available evidence does not show it advanced gender equality in the workplace or the home. It is included here as a cautionary case illustrating why family policy needs explicit gender-mainstreaming to count as a gender-equality practice.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Very high (> €5M) — National lump-sum cash transfer to mothers, indexed annually; the benefit reached approximately 737,204 rubles for a first child from February 2026.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — In continuous operation since 2007, extended to first children from 2020, and extended by the government through 2030.
Staffing & skills
Pension Fund of Russia (since 2023: Social Fund of Russia)

Conditions for success

  • Sustained long-term government commitment
  • Annual indexation of the benefit amount

Common failure modes

  • Channels support through mothers as primary caregivers without challenging the gendered division of paid and unpaid labour, so does not by itself advance workplace or household gender equality

Where it fits

Governance type
national government programme
Scale
national
Income level
upper-middle income (Russia)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 59

Macao's Women's Development Goals Plan

Macao

Macao SAR ran a seven-year, 21-department Women's Development Goals plan (2019-2025), reporting all 278 planned actions completed, and has launched …