evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

MIT's Optimization Algorithm Cuts Boston Public Schools' Bus Costs by $5 Million

United States of America · Boston · See the United States of America profile · See the Boston profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 82% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

MIT Operations Research Center PhD students won Boston Public Schools' 2016 routing challenge; their algorithm cut 50 buses (about 8% of the fleet), saved up to $5M a year, and was later peer-reviewed in the journal Interfaces (2020).

50 routes
Bus routes eliminated (2017-18 school year)
8 %
Fleet size reduction (2017-18 school year)
1 million miles
Driving miles reduced (first year)
20000 lbs/day
Daily CO2 emissions reduced
3 million USD
Annual cost savings (low estimate) (annual)
5 million USD
Annual cost savings (high estimate) (annual)
30 minutes
Route-plan generation time

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Boston Public Schools / MIT Operations Research Center
Period
2016–2020
Keywords
school transportation, logistics optimization, public education administration, operations research

Context

In 2016, Boston Public Schools launched a public "Transportation Challenge" inviting outside teams to redesign its school bus routes; a team from MIT's Operations Research Center, led by Professor Dimitris Bertsimas, won the competition.

Objectives

Redesign bus routing to cut costs, mileage and emissions while maintaining service, using an optimization algorithm that combines traffic, enrollment and address data.

Activities

Boston Public Schools piloted the winning algorithm for the 2017-18 school year, assigning students to stops, combining stops into routes and allocating vehicles using Google Maps traffic data; the methodology was later peer-reviewed and published in the journal Interfaces (2020).

Results

The district eliminated about 50 routes (roughly 8% of the fleet), cut about 1 million miles of driving, reduced daily CO2 emissions by an estimated 20,000 pounds, and saved between $3 million and $5 million annually, while cutting route-planning time from thousands of staff-hours to about 30 minutes.

Conclusions

The tool is an operations-research optimization system rather than a machine-learning model, and its savings are specific to Boston's route network and enrollment patterns; other districts would need their own re-optimization, and issues such as driver shortages remain separate from the routing math.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
MIT Operations Research Center PhD students (Arthur Delarue, Sébastien Martin) under Professor Dimitris Bertsimas, Boston Public Schools routing staff (roughly ten routers) whose manual process the algorithm replaced

Conditions for success

  • Access to Google Maps traffic data alongside district enrollment and address data
  • A public open challenge to source external optimization expertise
  • District willingness to replace an established manual routing process
  • Operations-research (not machine-learning) modeling capability

Common failure modes

  • Savings are specific to Boston's route network and enrollment patterns; other districts need their own re-optimization
  • The algorithm does not resolve separate driver-shortage or labor issues

Where it fits

Governance type
public school district
Scale
single large urban district
Income level
high-income (USA)

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful