evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Norway's Fathers' Quota (1993) — Evidence on a Reserved Paternity-Leave Period

Norway · Oslo · See the Norway profile · See the Oslo profile

Top 74% 44/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Norway reserved part of parental leave for fathers in 1993. Register studies find school gains at 16 when the father is better educated, mixed effects on fathers' earnings (none vs −2.1%) and no labour-market gain for mothers.

Details

Promoter
Norwegian Government (Ministry of Children and Family Affairs)
Period
1993–present
Keywords
parental leave, paternity leave, care, labour market

Description

On 1 April 1993 Norway introduced a paternal quota: a reserved share of parental leave available only to fathers and lost if unused. Finland, Iceland and Sweden later reserved shares for fathers too. Because the reform created a sharp cut-off in eligibility, economists have used it to estimate causal effects.
Cools, Fiva and Kirkebøen (CESifo Working Paper 3513, 2011) use Norwegian register data and find that school performance at age 16 increases for children whose father is relatively higher educated than the mother. They find no evidence that fathers' earnings and work hours are affected, and, contrary to expectation, that mothers' labour-market outcomes are adversely affected. They conclude that the findings do not suggest paternity leave shifts the gender balance at home in a way that raises mothers' market work.
Rege and Solli (Demography, 2013), also exploiting the 1993 reform, find that four weeks of paternity leave decrease fathers' future earnings by 2.1 percent, which the authors read as consistent with greater long-term father involvement in home production.
The practice is therefore evidenced and widely transferred, but its benefit for gender equality in the labour market is mixed; the two studies disagree on fathers' earnings and neither finds improved outcomes for mothers.

Read the full analysis: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/cesifo1_wp3513.pdf

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful