evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Nyandungu Urban Wetland Eco-Park: Restoring 122 Hectares in Kigali for Flood Control and Biodiversity

Rwanda · Kigali · See the Rwanda profile · See the Kigali profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 14% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

REMA restored 121.7 ha of degraded urban wetland in Kigali into the Nyandungu Eco-Park (2016–2020), replanting 17,000 native trees across 55 species. A 2016–2024 study found strong ecological recovery; the park drew 110,000+ visitors in 2025 and won Ramsar recognition.

121.7 ha
Wetland/forest area restored (2016-2020)
17000 trees, 55 species
Indigenous trees replanted
8574 metres
Walkways/cycle paths built
6.3 billion RWF (~US$5-6M), LDCF/GEF
Restoration financing
110000+ visitors/year (~300/day)
Visitors (2025)
4000 approx.
Green jobs created
100+
Bird species recolonised (2016-2024)
r=0.87-0.95, p≤0.05
Ecological recovery correlation (2016-2024)
Nyandungu Urban Wetland Eco-Park: Restoring 122 Hectares in Kigali for Flood Control and Biodiversity

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Rwanda Environment Management Authority (REMA), with GEF/LDCF financing
Period
2016–2020 restoration, opened 2020; monitored through 2024
Keywords
wetland restoration, urban biodiversity, flood mitigation, ecotourism, green jobs

Context

Rwanda's Environment Management Authority (REMA) restored 121.7 hectares of a degraded urban wetland in eastern Kigali (about 70 ha wetland, 50 ha forest), financed by roughly 6.3 billion RWF (~US$5-6 million) of Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF/GEF) money.

Objectives

Convert a degraded urban wetland into a flood-alleviation and biodiversity eco-park while creating recreational and economic value for surrounding Kigali neighbourhoods.

Activities

Between 2016 and 2020, the project replanted 17,000 indigenous trees across 55 native species, restored an indigenous fig forest, built five catchment ponds and three recreational ponds for flood alleviation, and constructed 8,574 metres of walkways and cycle paths.

Results

A peer-reviewed case study covering 2016-2024 recorded strong statistical correlations between the restoration and ecological recovery (r=0.87-0.95), economic benefits (r=0.76-0.82) and social outcomes (r=0.72-0.79), all significant at p≤0.05, and documented recolonisation by over 100 bird species. Rwandan press reported over 110,000 visitors in 2025 (~300/day) and roughly 4,000 green jobs created since restoration began; these come from park/REMA reporting, not independent audit. The park won the 2025 Star Wetland Centre Award and Ramsar COP14 recognition.

Conclusions

The visitor and jobs figures are explicitly sourced from park/REMA reporting rather than independent verification, though the ecological-recovery statistics come from a peer-reviewed case study.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — ~US$5-6 million (6.3 billion RWF) from LDCF/GEF financing for 121.7 ha of wetland/forest restoration, ponds and 8,574m of walkways/cycle paths.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Restoration works 2016-2020, opened 2020, ecological monitoring/case study through 2024, recognition in 2025.
Staffing & skills
Rwanda Environment Management Authority (REMA) project team, LDCF/GEF financing partners, landscaping/restoration crews, park operations and visitor-services staff

Conditions for success

  • dedicated national-agency ownership (REMA)
  • secured multi-year international climate financing (LDCF/GEF)
  • combining flood-control engineering (ponds) with biodiversity replanting and public-access infrastructure

Common failure modes

  • visitor/jobs figures are self-reported by park/REMA, not independently audited

Where it fits

Governance type
national environmental agency
Scale
city (Kigali)
Income level
low-income, internationally co-financed

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful