evidoria

What works in Rwanda

All catalogues

50
evaluated practices
64/100
average quality score
10%
strong evidence, of 49 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Rwanda

Rwanda has implemented three major institutional reforms with documented results. Land titling that includes women's names reached near-universal coverage by 2013 and produced a ~19 percentage point increase in investment among female-headed households, demonstrating that resolving women's tenure insecurity drives economic response. A constitutional gender quota of ≥30% in all elected positions has raised women's parliamentary representation to 63.8% by 2024, the world's highest. IremboGov's multi-channel e-government platform serves citizens through web, app, USSD text interface, and 7,000+ agents, processing over 25 million applications to date and reducing processing times from ~5 days to 24 hours—though the practices do not quantify how many citizens remain excluded by low digital literacy (53% reported) or offline access barriers.

Drawn from: Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · Rwanda's Constitutional Gender Quota and Gender Monitoring Office · IremboGov's Last-Mile Agent Network and USSD Interface — Designing E-Government for Rwanda's Low-Literacy, Offline Citizens · IremboGov — Rwanda's Web, App and USSD Multi-Channel Design for a Low-Smartphone Population · Digital Umuganda — Building Open Voice Data and AI Services for Kinyarwanda, Rwanda's National Language · Digital Ambassadors Programme (Rwanda) · Bandebereho — Gender-Transformative Fathers' and Couples' Programme · Carnegie Mellon University Africa: A $275.7M Partnership for African Tech Talent Retention

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +33 pts 81 here · 48 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 89 here · 66 average

Evaluated outcomes +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Impact on gender equality +19 pts 89 here · 70 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +17 pts 91 here · 74 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 62 here · 48 average

Achievement / evidence +13 pts 100 here · 87 average

Evidence of learning impact +13 pts 39 here · 26 average

Inclusiveness / equity +12 pts 55 here · 43 average

Equity & inclusion +12 pts 61 here · 50 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Transparency, ethics & data protection -8 pts 39 here · 47 average

Efficiency -9 pts 22 here · 32 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
81 · 48
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
89 · 66
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 78
Impact on gender equality
89 · 70
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
91 · 74
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
62 · 48
Achievement / evidence
100 · 87
Evidence of learning impact
39 · 26
Inclusiveness / equity
55 · 43
Equity & inclusion
61 · 50
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Innovation level
69 · 62
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 38
Transparency, fairness & accountability
58 · 54
Transferability / replicability
62 · 60
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
29 · 27
Evidence of impact / measured public value
58 · 57
Sustainability (ongoing)
78 · 78
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
5 · 6
Scalability beyond pilot
60 · 62
Governance, certification & transferability
61 · 64
Curator validation
67 · 73
Documented learning
67 · 74
Transparency, ethics & data protection
39 · 47
Efficiency
22 · 32

Coloured bar: Rwanda. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · 100

Rwanda's Constitutional Gender Quota and Gender Monitoring Office · 96

IremboGov's Last-Mile Agent Network and USSD Interface — Designing E-Government for Rwanda's Low-Literacy, Offline Citizens · 96

IremboGov — Rwanda's Web, App and USSD Multi-Channel Design for a Low-Smartphone Population · 96

Digital Umuganda — Building Open Voice Data and AI Services for Kinyarwanda, Rwanda's National Language · 92

Digital Ambassadors Programme (Rwanda) · 92

Bandebereho — Gender-Transformative Fathers' and Couples' Programme · 89

Carnegie Mellon University Africa: A $275.7M Partnership for African Tech Talent Retention · 86

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Rwanda concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Colorado Equal Pay for Equal Work Act (2021) — Mandatory Salary Transparency and Pay Equity · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more