evidoria

What works in Rwanda

All catalogues

40
evaluated practices
65/100
average quality score
7%
strong evidence, of 28 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Rwanda

Rwanda has implemented several large-scale programmes to strengthen women's economic security and political participation. Land titling that registers parcels in both spouses' names produced a ~19 percentage point increase in investment by female-headed households, while a constitutional gender quota of ≥30% in elected positions raised women's representation in Parliament to 63.8% by 2024—the world's highest. To extend digital government services beyond smartphone-owning populations, Rwanda deployed 7,000+ field agents and a feature-phone USSD interface, raising independent online completion of applications from 31% to 41% between 2022 and 2023. These practices demonstrate Rwanda's focus on inclusion across tenure, representation, and digital access, though the evidence does not quantify outcomes in rural livelihoods, service quality, or persistence of customary barriers to women's land rights.

Drawn from: Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · Rwanda's Constitutional Gender Quota and Gender Monitoring Office · IremboGov's Last-Mile Agent Network and USSD Interface — Designing E-Government for Rwanda's Low-Literacy, Offline Citizens · IremboGov — Rwanda's Web, App and USSD Multi-Channel Design for a Low-Smartphone Population · Digital Ambassadors Programme (Rwanda) · Bandebereho — Gender-Transformative Fathers' and Couples' Programme · Carnegie Mellon University Africa: A $275.7M Partnership for African Tech Talent Retention · Rwanda's Gender Budget Statements — National-to-District Gender-Responsive Budgeting

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +36 pts 87 here · 50 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Inclusiveness / equity +20 pts 62 here · 42 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +20 pts 96 here · 76 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Evidence of learning impact +12 pts 40 here · 28 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +9 pts 47 here · 37 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Weaknesses

Governance, certification & transferability -10 pts 55 here · 64 average

Documented learning -14 pts 60 here · 74 average

Efficiency -19 pts 25 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 44
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
87 · 50
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Inclusiveness / equity
62 · 42
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
96 · 76
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Evidence of learning impact
40 · 28
Teacher capability & pedagogy
47 · 37
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Innovation level
70 · 63
Transparency, fairness & accountability
59 · 54
Transferability / replicability
63 · 59
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
53 · 50
Equity & inclusion
53 · 52
Curator validation
75 · 74
Evidence of impact / measured public value
59 · 59
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
7 · 7
Sustainability (ongoing)
78 · 78
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
27 · 31
Scalability beyond pilot
58 · 64
Transparency, ethics & data protection
40 · 48
Governance, certification & transferability
55 · 64
Documented learning
60 · 74
Efficiency
25 · 44

Coloured bar: Rwanda. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · 100

Rwanda's Constitutional Gender Quota and Gender Monitoring Office · 96

IremboGov's Last-Mile Agent Network and USSD Interface — Designing E-Government for Rwanda's Low-Literacy, Offline Citizens · 96

IremboGov — Rwanda's Web, App and USSD Multi-Channel Design for a Low-Smartphone Population · 96

Digital Ambassadors Programme (Rwanda) · 92

Bandebereho — Gender-Transformative Fathers' and Couples' Programme · 89

Carnegie Mellon University Africa: A $275.7M Partnership for African Tech Talent Retention · 86

Rwanda's Gender Budget Statements — National-to-District Gender-Responsive Budgeting · 85

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Rwanda concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more