evidoria

What works in Kigali

All catalogues · Rwanda profile

20
evaluated practices
66/100
average quality score
10%
strong evidence, of 20 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +27 pts 78 here · 51 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Inclusiveness / equity +17 pts 58 here · 41 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +13 pts 92 here · 78 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of impact / measured public value -8 pts 52 here · 60 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Documented learning
100 · 73
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
78 · 51
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Inclusiveness / equity
58 · 41
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 53
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
92 · 78
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Innovation level
72 · 64
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Transparency, fairness & accountability
60 · 54
Teacher capability & pedagogy
44 · 39
Governance, certification & transferability
71 · 66
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 30
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
11 · 9
Transferability / replicability
62 · 59
Sustainability (ongoing)
82 · 80
Curator validation
75 · 75
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 35
Efficiency
50 · 52
Scalability beyond pilot
61 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
44 · 50
Evidence of impact / measured public value
52 · 60

Coloured bar: Kigali. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · 100

Rwanda's Constitutional Gender Quota and Gender Monitoring Office · 96

Digital Ambassadors Programme (Rwanda) · 92

Bandebereho — Gender-Transformative Fathers' and Couples' Programme · 89

IremboGov AI Chatbot — Rwanda's Trilingual Virtual Assistant for the National Digital Services Platform · 80

Digital Ambassadors Program (DAP) — Gender-Balanced Digital Literacy Corps, Rwanda · 74

Kigali Innovation City — Pan-African Technology and Innovation District · 67

Norrsken House Kigali · 62

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence

work2future · fit 75/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more