evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Observatoire des Algorithmes Publics — a Citizen-Led Monitor Exposing France's Unenforced 2016 Transparency Law

France · Paris · See the France profile · See the Paris profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 83% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Researchers launched a citizen-led observatory in Nov 2024 to track which French agencies disclose their algorithms as a 2016 law requires — evidence behind the Ombudsperson's finding that the duty has been a 'dead letter' since enactment.

Observatoire des Algorithmes Publics — a Citizen-Led Monitor Exposing France's Unenforced 2016 Transparency Law

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Observatoire des algorithmes publics (independent researcher-led initiative)
Period
2024–present
Region (NUTS)
FR10
Keywords
algorithmic accountability, civic monitoring, administrative law

Context

France's 2016 Law for a Digital Republic requires public administrations with 50+ staff to publish the rules behind algorithms used in individual decisions. In November 2024, researchers Camille Girard-Chanudet, Estelle Hary and Soizic Pénicaud launched the Observatoire des Algorithmes Publics, an independent citizen-led initiative to track which agencies actually comply.

Objectives

To identify which public bodies disclose their algorithms as the law requires and make the findings public, building an evidence base on a duty that had gone largely unenforced.

Activities

The observatory monitors agency compliance with the 2016 disclosure obligation and publishes its findings independently of government.

Results

The observatory's findings converge with the French national Ombudsperson's (Défenseure des Droits) 13 November 2024 report, which concluded the disclosure duty has been a "dead letter" since enactment, with compliance limited to a few exceptions such as France Travail. France's Conseil d'État separately noted the obligation carries no sanction.

Conclusions

As a small independent research team without enforcement power, the observatory's own coverage remains partial; its significance is that an official state institution has now echoed evidence it first assembled. The Ombudsperson recommends the government introduce penalties for non-compliance and publish a compliance inventory.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Low cost: run by three named independent researchers rather than a funded institution, with no described infrastructure beyond monitoring and publishing findings.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Launched November 2024 and still described as a young initiative with partial coverage; no multi-year funded roadmap is documented.
Staffing & skills
Researchers Camille Girard-Chanudet, Estelle Hary and Soizic Pénicaud (independent, citizen-led initiative)

Conditions for success

  • Corroboration and amplification by an official state institution (Défenseure des Droits)
  • Sustained tracking of agency-by-agency compliance

Common failure modes

  • No enforcement power or formal legal mandate of its own
  • Coverage of France's thousands of eligible public bodies remains partial
  • No dedicated funding as a small independent team

Commonly funded by

CERV — Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful