evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

One Stop Crisis Centre (OSCC) — Malaysia's Hospital-Based Model for GBV Survivors

Malaysia · Kuala Lumpur · See the Malaysia profile · See the Kuala Lumpur profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 61% 56/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Piloted at Hospital Kuala Lumpur in 1994 and mandated nationwide by a 1996 Ministry of Health circular, Malaysia's OSCC places medical, police, legal and shelter referral under one hospital roof for survivors of rape, domestic violence and child abuse.

~90 %
Government hospitals operating an OSCC by the late 1990s (1997-1999)
1,099 cases
Hospital Kuala Lumpur OSCC rape cases (2005)
1,851 cases
Hospital Kuala Lumpur OSCC IPV cases (2005)
1,454 cases
Hospital Kuala Lumpur OSCC rape cases (2006)
2,159 cases
Hospital Kuala Lumpur OSCC IPV cases (2006)
One Stop Crisis Centre (OSCC) — Malaysia's Hospital-Based Model for GBV Survivors

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Ministry of Health Malaysia / Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Period
1994–present
Keywords
health, hospital-based services, gender-based violence, emergency medicine, public policy

Context

The One Stop Crisis Centre (OSCC) model began as a pilot at Hospital Kuala Lumpur in 1994, championed by emergency-department clinicians and women's NGOs who found that survivors of rape, domestic violence and child abuse were being shunted between separate medical, police and welfare offices.

Objectives

A 1996 Ministry of Health circular made OSCCs mandatory in state hospitals, with district hospitals following in 1997, aiming to place medical, police, legal and shelter referral under one hospital roof.

Activities

By the late 1990s roughly 90% of Malaysian government hospitals operated an OSCC inside their emergency departments.

Results

Hospital-level case registers show sustained caseloads: Hospital Kuala Lumpur's OSCC recorded 1,099 rape cases, 1,851 intimate-partner-violence cases and 160 child-abuse cases in 2005, rising to 1,454 rape, 2,159 IPV and 214 child-abuse cases in 2006.

Conclusions

An independent academic policy analysis of the scale-up found that once the founding coalition between women's groups and health professionals weakened, many OSCCs were 'physically there but then... not staffed,' for lack of dedicated funding, and services drifted toward a narrower medical focus with less attention to survivors' non-medical needs.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — No dedicated funding stream is documented in the evaluation reviewed; staffing gaps followed from a lack of dedicated funding once the founding coalition weakened.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Piloted 1994 at Hospital Kuala Lumpur; mandated in state hospitals 1996, district hospitals 1997.
Staffing & skills
Emergency-department clinicians and women's NGOs formed the founding coalition; OSCCs co-locate medical, police, legal and shelter referral within the hospital emergency department.

Conditions for success

  • A working coalition between women's groups and health professionals sustaining dedicated funding and staffing.

Common failure modes

  • Once the founding coalition weakened, many OSCCs were 'physically there but then... not staffed,' for lack of dedicated funding.
  • Services drifted toward a narrower medical focus with less attention to survivors' non-medical needs.

Where it fits

Governance type
Ministry of Health circular mandate
Scale
national (~90% of government hospitals)
Income level
upper-middle-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful