Allegheny Family Screening Tool (USA)
United States of America
Since 2016 Allegheny County has used a predictive risk model to support child-maltreatment call screening. Evaluations found it narrowed racial …
United States of America · Salem · See the United States of America profile
Top 94% 27/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Oregon DHS used a risk-score algorithm from 2018 to help hotline workers screen child-neglect reports, and retired it by June 2022 for a Structured Decision Making model, after reporting on bias in the Allegheny tool that inspired it.
From 2018 Oregon's Department of Human Services used the Safety at Screening Tool, which generated numerical scores estimating the likelihood a child would end up in foster care or be investigated again, to help hotline workers decide which child-abuse and neglect reports should be investigated. Workers kept discretion over the final decision. The tool was inspired by the Allegheny Family Screening Tool in Pennsylvania.
In April 2022 the Associated Press reported Carnegie Mellon University research on Allegheny's algorithm: it would have recommended that about two-thirds of Black children be investigated, compared with about half of all other children. Oregon said its tool included a 'fairness correction'. In May 2022 DHS told staff it would stop using the algorithm by the end of June 2022.
DHS's stated reason was that the predictive tool could not be incorporated into its new Structured Decision Making model, which relies on family-specific information; officials also referred to equity and continuous quality improvement. Senator Ron Wyden publicly criticised the use of 'untested algorithms' in decisions about families. No independent evaluation of Oregon's own tool has been published in the sources reviewed.
Lesson: agencies adopting imported predictive models should require local, published validation and disparity testing before deployment, and plan an exit path.
Read the full analysis: https://www.npr.org/2022/06/02/1102661376/oregon-drops-artificial-intelligence-child-abuse-cases
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
United States of America
Since 2016 Allegheny County has used a predictive risk model to support child-maltreatment call screening. Evaluations found it narrowed racial …
Chile
Since 2019, Chile's Subsecretariat of Social Evaluation has piloted a machine-learning risk score prioritising at-risk children in 12 communes. Seven …
Argentina
In 2018 Salta province (Argentina) and Microsoft built a predictive-analytics algorithm claiming to flag named girls "predestined" for teen pregnancy …
Greenland
DMI's ASIP uses a convolutional neural network fusing Sentinel-1 radar and AMSR2 microwave data to generate Greenland coastal sea-ice charts, …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.