evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

PAVD — Portugal's National Programme for Domestic Violence Perpetrators

Portugal · Lisbon · See the Portugal profile · See the Lisbon profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 42% 74/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Portugal's DGRSP runs a mandatory, 18-month, three-phase programme for domestic-violence offenders. Over 10,600 men took part since 2011, reaching a 2025 record of 3,954; an independent evaluation found reduced violence risk.

10,696
Cumulative men enrolled since 2011
3,200 men
Men enrolled (2024)
3,954 men
Men enrolled (2025)
3,168 men
Men enrolled (Q1 2026)
3 EUR million
EEA Grants award for national training academy
PAVD — Portugal's National Programme for Domestic Violence Perpetrators

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais (DGRSP)
Period
2011-present
Keywords
justice, probation, domestic violence, offender rehabilitation

Context

Portugal's Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais (DGRSP) has run the Programa para Agressores de Violência Doméstica (PAVD) nationwide since 2011, ordering men convicted of, or facing prosecution for, domestic violence into a structured accountability and behaviour-change programme as a condition of sentencing, probation, suspended prosecution or parole. A parallel island programme, CONTIGO, serves the Azores, and a prison-based variant, VIDA, was added in 2018 and had expanded to ten prison facilities by 2020-2021.

Activities

The programme has a minimum duration of 18 months across three mandatory phases: a six-month stabilisation phase using individual case management and motivational-interviewing techniques; a psychoeducational phase of 20 group sessions addressing conjugal violence, legitimising beliefs and alcohol misuse; and a relapse-prevention phase of individual follow-up.

Results

Participation has grown steadily: from a 2011-present cumulative total of 10,696 men, enrolment reached 2,494 in Q4 2023, then 3,200 in 2024 (a 7.7% year-on-year rise), and 3,954 across all of 2025 — the highest figure to date. In the first quarter of 2026 alone, 3,168 men were enrolled, up from 2,909 in the same period of 2025. An external evaluation commissioned from CESPU found the programme achieved a reduction in violence risk, a reduction in beliefs that legitimise violence, a reduction in addictive behaviours (particularly alcohol misuse), and an increase in offenders' self-accountability, which CESPU linked to increased recidivism prevention.

Conclusions

CESPU's findings are reported qualitatively, without a published quantitative recidivism rate or a control group, and Portugal's Justice Minister has separately announced a dedicated recidivism study using archived case files precisely because this gap remains open. DGRSP itself has acknowledged that despite record enrolment, the number of offenders who attend remains low relative to the total number of domestic violence convictions, and is using a EUR 3 million EEA Grants award to build a new national training academy to strengthen facilitator capacity and monitoring.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Direção-Geral de Reinserção e Serviços Prisionais (DGRSP), CESPU (Instituto de Ciências da Saúde do Norte) — external evaluator

Conditions for success

  • minimum 18-month structured pathway across three mandatory phases
  • court/probation/parole referral as condition of sentencing
  • island (CONTIGO) and prison-based (VIDA) variants extending coverage

Common failure modes

  • no published quantitative recidivism rate or control group in CESPU's evaluation
  • enrolment still low relative to the total number of domestic violence convictions

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes CERV — Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful