evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Perspektive Wiedereinstieg — Germany's Federal Programme Coaching Career-Break Returners Back Into Work

Germany · Berlin · See the Germany profile · See the Berlin profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 39% 71/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

A German federal-state programme giving individual coaching to women and men re-entering the labour market after multi-year family-care breaks, with ESF-monitored outcome data showing roughly two-thirds of coached participants moved into jobs, self-employment or training.

17,000+
People reached through information and counselling (Mar 2009–Feb 2012)
4,660
Participants receiving intensive coaching (Mar 2009–Feb 2012)
69%
Success rate, first programme phase (Mar 2009–Feb 2012)
68%
Success rate, second programme phase
65%+
Moved into covered employment or qualification, full 2007-2013 ESF period (2007-2013)

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ) with the Bundesagentur für Arbeit
Period
2008–2020
Keywords
workforce re-entry, active labour market policy, gender equality

Context

'Perspektive Wiedereinstieg' is a German federal action programme, launched in 2008 by the Federal Ministry for Family Affairs, Senior Citizens, Women and Youth (BMFSFJ) together with the Federal Employment Agency, targeting people, overwhelmingly women, who left skilled or professional jobs for three or more years for childcare or family-care responsibilities.

Activities

Rather than a single national service, the programme funded local project sponsors to run individual coaching, tailored qualification and employer-engagement measures at model sites across the country, financed through the European Social Fund (ESF).

Results

In the first ESF model phase (March 2009–February 2012), the programme ran at 20 locations with 28 project sponsors, reaching over 17,000 people, of whom 4,660 received intensive individual coaching; 69% of those who completed the coaching found employment, self-employment or further training. A second phase reported a comparable 68% success rate, and across the 2007–2013 ESF period as a whole, more than 65% of nearly 7,000 intensively supported participants moved into social-security-covered employment or qualification.

Conclusions

The consistent ~65–69% success rates come from programme-level monitoring rather than an independent randomised or matched-comparison evaluation, so some of the apparent effect could reflect selection into a programme that already-motivated returners chose to join. The programme continued through the 2014–2020 ESF period before its funding line was absorbed into other federal labour-market measures.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
local project sponsors delivering individual coaching (28 sponsors across 20 locations in the first model phase), BMFSFJ and Bundesagentur für Arbeit as programme co-owners, employer-engagement staff conducting outreach to address hiring bias

Conditions for success

  • individual case management combined with direct employer outreach to counter hiring bias against long-career-break candidates
  • ESF co-financing enabling a distributed network of local sponsors rather than one central service

Common failure modes

  • consistent ~65-69% success rates rely on programme-level monitoring rather than a randomised or matched comparison, so selection into the programme by already-motivated returners may inflate the apparent effect
  • the funding line was eventually absorbed into other federal labour-market measures rather than continuing as a distinct programme

Where it fits

Governance type
federal ministry + national employment agency, delivered via local project sponsors
Scale
national (Germany), 20+ locations
Income level
high-income

Commonly funded by

ESF+ — European Social Fund Plus National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 91

TRIEC Mentoring Partnership

Canada

Since 2004, Toronto's TRIEC Mentoring Partnership has logged 27,000+ mentoring matches for skilled immigrants; an independent, federally funded evaluation found …