evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Phoenix Islands Protected Area Conservation Trust — Avoided-Cost Marine Payment for Ecosystem Services (Kiribati)

Kiribati · Kanton · See the Kiribati profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 99% 13/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Kiribati and Conservation International built a trust fund to pay the government a 'reverse fishing licence' fee to forgo tuna revenue in the 408,250 km² Phoenix Islands reserve; the 2015 full closure was reversed to commercial fishing in 2021.

408250 km²
Marine protected area
5 US$ million
Initial trust capitalisation (2013)
25 US$ million
Trust funding target
7 US$ million (approx.)
Total funds actually raised
60-140 US$ million
Estimated lost purse-seine revenue since 2015 (2015-2021)
850000 US$/year
Estimated annual lost longline revenue
70 %
Share of Kiribati government revenue from fishing licences
Phoenix Islands Protected Area Conservation Trust — Avoided-Cost Marine Payment for Ecosystem Services (Kiribati)

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Government of Kiribati / Conservation International
Period
2008-2021 (established 2008, full closure 2015, reopened to fishing 2021)
Keywords
marine protected area, avoided-cost PES, fisheries revenue, conservation trust fund

Context

The Phoenix Islands Protected Area (PIPA), designated in 2008 and UNESCO World Heritage-listed since 2010, is a 408,250 km² marine reserve — about 1.5 times the size of New Zealand. Because foreign fishing-licence revenue supplies over 70% of Kiribati's national government revenue, full protection from commercial tuna fishing carries a direct fiscal cost, which Kiribati and Conservation International's Global Conservation Fund sought to offset through a 'reverse fishing licence' trust fund.

Objectives

The trust was designed to pay Kiribati directly to forgo commercial fishing-licence revenue inside PIPA, compensating the government for the opportunity cost of a full no-take closure, with a long-term funding target of US$25 million.

Activities

The trust was capitalised with an initial US$5 million (US$2.5 million from Kiribati matched by Conservation International, committed 23 September 2013). In 2015 Kiribati closed the entire reserve to commercial fishing, up from just 3% no-take coverage previously.

Results

The trust's raised balance fell well short of its US$25 million target — one Kiribati government statement put total funds raised at only about US$7 million. In November 2021, Kiribati's Cabinet reopened PIPA to commercial fishing, citing lost purse-seine revenue estimated at US$60-140 million since 2015 and roughly US$850,000 per year in lost longline revenue.

Conclusions

Former President Anote Tong, who championed the original closure, publicly disputed the government's stated rationale for reopening. The case is documented here as a cautionary example of the limits of avoided-cost PES trust mechanisms at national scale when compensation fails to match the real opportunity cost.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Trust capitalised at US$5 million against a US$25 million target; band reflects a multi-million-dollar national conservation fund.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Reserve designated 2008, full closure 2015, reopened to fishing 2021 — a 13-year, decade-scale national policy arc.
Staffing & skills
Government of Kiribati, Conservation International's Global Conservation Fund

Conditions for success

  • Compensation must match the real fiscal opportunity cost of forgone fishing-licence revenue
  • Trust fund must reach its full capitalisation target to sustain a permanent closure
  • Sustained political commitment across changes in government

Common failure modes

  • Trust raised only about US$7 million against a US$25 million target, well short of what was needed to sustain the closure
  • Estimated lost revenue (US$60-140 million in purse-seine revenue alone since 2015) far exceeded what the trust could compensate
  • Government's stated rationale for reopening was publicly disputed by the closure's original champion, former President Anote Tong

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes Philanthropic / foundation funding

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful