evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Plan9 — Pakistan's Largest Government-Backed Tech Incubator

Pakistan · Lahore · See the Pakistan profile · See the Lahore profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 82% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Punjab's state-run Plan9 incubator says it has graduated 1,100+ startups and created 24,000+ jobs since 2012 across seven cities — but independent reporting finds 60-80% startup failure rates and a collapse in national investment since 2021.

160 startups
Startups graduated (original Plan9 Lahore) (10 cohorts)
70 USD million
Combined valuation
30 startups
Startups with follow-on funding
3.5 USD million
Follow-on funding raised
60 %
Follow-on funding rate
1100 startups
Startups graduated (network-wide) (by March 2025)
2.9 PKR billion
Revenue generated (by March 2025)
24000 jobs
Jobs created (by March 2025)
360 USD million
National startup investment (2021)
70 USD million
National startup investment (2023)
60-70 %
Regional Plan9 city failure rate (one manager's cohort)
52 ventures
Ventures under that manager's supervision
>80 %
National startup failure rate within 3 years

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Punjab Information Technology Board (PITB) — Plan9
Period
2012-2025
Keywords
startup incubation, information technology, entrepreneurship, digital economy

Context

Plan9 is a government-run startup incubator launched by the Punjab Information Technology Board (PITB) in August 2012, based at Lahore's Arfa Software Technology Park, as one of Pakistan's earliest state-backed responses to under-employment among engineering and computer-science graduates.

Objectives

To incubate technology startups and address graduate under-employment through state-backed entrepreneurship support, later replicated regionally as 'Regional Plan9'.

Activities

Plan9 ran 10 cohorts graduating 160 startups in Lahore. PITB replicated the model as 'Regional Plan9' in six further Punjab cities: Dera Ghazi Khan, Rawalpindi, Sahiwal, Gujranwala, Kamra and Kharian.

Results

Plan9 itself reports having graduated 160 startups reaching a combined valuation of roughly US$70 million; about 30 raised a combined US$3.5 million in outside investment (60% follow-on funding rate). By March 2025 the network as a whole reported over 1,100 startups graduated, Rs2.9 billion in revenue, and more than 24,000 jobs created. Independent Pakistani reporting complicates this picture: national startup investment collapsed from roughly US$360 million in 2021 to US$70 million in 2023; one Regional Plan9 city manager told Dawn newspaper that 60-70% of the 52 ventures under her supervision ultimately failed; and industry commentary cited in the same report puts nationwide startup failure above 80% within three years.

Conclusions

Plan9 demonstrates real multi-city replication and scale within Pakistan's state-backed incubation efforts, but independent reporting on high failure rates and a national investment collapse since 2021 indicates weak outcome durability behind the headline growth figures.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Punjab Information Technology Board (PITB) — programme owner, Regional Plan9 city managers in six additional Punjab cities

Conditions for success

  • State funding and infrastructure (Arfa Software Technology Park) to host incubated startups
  • Multi-city replication to broaden reach beyond the capital

Common failure modes

  • National startup investment collapsed from ~US$360m (2021) to ~US$70m (2023), constraining follow-on funding
  • A regional manager reported 60-70% failure among her 52 supervised ventures
  • Industry commentary cites above 80% national startup failure within three years, linked to weak product-market fit and thin follow-on capital

Where it fits

Governance type
national/regional government
Scale
regional
Income level
lower-middle-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful