evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Pragya Prasun v. Union of India — India's Supreme Court Makes Digital Access a Fundamental Right and Orders Accessible e-KYC

India · New Delhi · See the India profile · See the New Delhi profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 24% 92/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

On 30 April 2025, India's Supreme Court ruled that digital access is intrinsic to the Article 21 right to life, and directed the RBI to let blind and acid-attack-survivor customers pass e-KYC 'liveness' checks via thumb impression instead of the default eye-blink test.

Pragya Prasun v. Union of India — India's Supreme Court Makes Digital Access a Fundamental Right and Orders Accessible e-KYC

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Supreme Court of India / Reserve Bank of India
Period
April 2025 – ongoing
Keywords
governance, financial regulation, digital identity, disability rights, law

Context

On 30 April 2025, the Supreme Court of India ruled in Pragya Prasun & Ors. v. Union of India that the right to digital access is an intrinsic component of the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution. The case was brought by acid-attack survivors with severe eye burns and a blind petitioner, who could not complete banks' digital e-KYC identity checks.

Activities

The Court found that the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions on KYC prohibited any 'prompting' during digital verification and defaulted to an eye-blink 'liveness' test, leaving blind and visually disfigured users with no accommodation. The Court directed the RBI to issue revised guidelines permitting alternative liveness-verification methods, including accepting a thumb impression in place of the blink test.

Conclusions

As of the ruling, implementation was still under way: legal and regulatory advisory firms published detailed 'action point' guidance for banks and NBFCs on how to comply, indicating that consistent nationwide rollout across all regulated entities had not yet been independently verified.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — Compliance cost borne by banks/NBFCs updating verification systems; not disclosed.
Time to results
Short (< 1 year) — Ruling issued 30 April 2025; compliance guidance published shortly after.
Staffing & skills
Reserve Bank of India regulatory staff, bank and NBFC compliance teams

Conditions for success

  • a binding Supreme Court directive compelling regulatory action
  • an alternative liveness-verification method (thumb impression) specified as an accommodation

Common failure modes

  • nationwide rollout across all regulated entities not yet independently verified

Where it fits

Governance type
national judiciary + financial regulator
Scale
national
Income level
lower-middle income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful