evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Predicting Priority Cases for Uruguay's Crece Contigo — An MIT-MIDES Fairness-Aware Model Still Under Evaluation

Uruguay · Montevideo · See the Uruguay profile · See the Montevideo profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 62% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

MIT students and MIDES built fairness-aware ML models on 15,436 anonymized case referrals to help Uruguay's Crece Contigo program prioritize pregnant women and young children for support. As of mid-2025 the tool remains under evaluation, not yet deployed.

15,000+
Historical referral cases used for model development
Predicting Priority Cases for Uruguay's Crece Contigo — An MIT-MIDES Fairness-Aware Model Still Under Evaluation Predicting Priority Cases for Uruguay's Crece Contigo — An MIT-MIDES Fairness-Aware Model Still Under Evaluation

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
Ministerio de Desarrollo Social (MIDES) with MIT MISTI
Period
2024-2025 (pilot and evaluation, not yet deployed)
Keywords
social protection, child and maternal welfare, public administration

Context

Uruguay's Ministry of Social Development (MIDES) runs Uruguay Crece Contigo, supporting pregnant women and children under four living in extreme poverty; caseworkers historically prioritised referrals manually, risking inconsistency and bias. MIT students, advised by a PhD candidate, worked with MIDES on anonymised data from over 15,000 historical referral cases, testing gradient-boosted trees, neural networks, LSTMs and ensemble methods with fairness-aware techniques (SMOTE, RUS) intended to reduce bias against under-represented groups.

Results

As of mid-2025 the model remained a decision-support prototype under internal MIDES evaluation; no deployment date or performance figures have been published, making this an early-stage, honestly-unproven case rather than a demonstrated success story.

Conclusions

It is nonetheless Uruguay's first documented attempt to apply machine learning to social-programme targeting, and reflects the country's broader push -- a national AI Observatory and AGESIC oversight -- toward auditable government AI use.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Short (< 1 year)
Staffing & skills
Ministry of Social Development (MIDES), MIT students and PhD advisor

Conditions for success

  • fairness-aware modelling techniques (SMOTE, RUS) to reduce bias against under-represented groups

Common failure modes

  • still a prototype under internal evaluation; no deployment date or performance figures published

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful