evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

SAFE-RISCCS — Nepal's Early-Stage AI Landslide Early-Warning Pilot

Nepal · Kathmandu · See the Nepal profile · See the Kathmandu profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 88% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Melbourne and Tribhuvan universities, with Nepal's disaster authority, pilot SAFE-RISCCS, AI fusing rainfall, ground-movement and satellite data to flag landslide risk weeks ahead at two sites — though developers say a year of data is still needed to forecast reliably.

59 %
Share of Nepal's land estimated as landslide-prone (government estimate)
>80 %
Share of Nepal's land lying on a slope (government estimate)
~45,000 landslides
Landslides triggered by the 2015 Gorkha earthquake (2015)
~2 months
Duration of sensor data collection at pilot sites as of mid-2025 (mid-2025)
SAFE-RISCCS — Nepal's Early-Stage AI Landslide Early-Warning Pilot

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority (Nepal) & University of Melbourne
Period
2024–present (pilot, data collection ongoing)
Keywords
disaster risk reduction, landslide early warning, remote sensing, machine learning, climate adaptation

Context

Nepal is exceptionally exposed to landslides: government estimates put about 59% of the country's land as landslide-prone, and more than 80% of it lies on a slope. The 2015 Gorkha earthquake alone triggered roughly 45,000 separate landslides. Nepal's National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority (NDRRMA) has been building a national Landslide Early Warning System with support from Australia's Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

Objectives

Within that effort, researchers from the University of Melbourne (led by Professor Antoinette Tordesillas), Tribhuvan University, and partners in Britain and Italy are testing SAFE-RISCCS, an AI system designed to fuse rainfall gauges, ground-movement sensors, local resident observations and satellite imagery from NASA, the European Space Agency and Japan's JAXA to flag landslide risk up to weeks in advance.

Activities

It is being rolled out at two high-risk pilot sites: Kimtang in Nuwakot district and Jyotinagar in Dhading district.

Results

As of mid-2025, sensors at each site had been collecting data for only about two months, and the project team says a dataset spanning a year or two is needed before the AI component can reliably generate automated graphical alerts from rainfall forecasts. No accuracy figures, false-alarm rates, lead-time validation or lives-saved estimates have been published for SAFE-RISCCS, and no independent evaluation of the system yet exists.

Conclusions

This is an early pilot rather than a proven early-warning tool: its case for inclusion rests on a credible government-anchored institutional setup (NDRRMA as implementing partner, bilateral Australian government funding, an international university consortium) rather than on demonstrated forecasting performance. It is included as a transparent, cautionary example of AI adoption in progress — worth tracking as the data record lengthens, not yet worth relying on.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k) — Not quantified in dollar terms in the source; funded via bilateral Australian government support (DFAT) together with international university partners.
Time to results
Long (> 3 years) — Pilot running since 2024; data collection ongoing as of mid-2025; the team states one to two years of further data are needed before reliable automated AI alerts are possible.
Staffing & skills
National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority (NDRRMA), Nepal — implementing government partner, University of Melbourne (Prof. Antoinette Tordesillas, lead researcher), Tribhuvan University, Research partners in Britain and Italy, Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade — bilateral funder

Conditions for success

  • Multi-source data fusion: rainfall gauges, ground-movement sensors, resident observations, and satellite imagery (NASA/ESA/JAXA)
  • Sustained multi-year sensor data collection before AI alerting becomes reliable
  • Bilateral government funding and an international university consortium providing technical backing

Common failure modes

  • Only about two months of sensor data collected at each site as of mid-2025 — the team says one to two years are needed before AI can reliably generate automated alerts
  • No accuracy, false-alarm-rate, lead-time validation, or lives-saved estimates have been published
  • No independent evaluation yet exists

Where it fits

Governance type
national disaster-management authority with an international academic consortium and bilateral donor
Scale
two high-risk pilot sites (sub-national)
Income level
low-income

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful