Good practice

Programme SASA! de Mobilisation Communautaire contre les Violences Conjugales — Ouganda

Uganda · Kampala · See the Uganda profile

SASA! est un modèle de mobilisation communautaire pour la prévention des violences conjugales (VPI), développé à Kampala, Ouganda. Un essai contrôlé randomisé par grappes (2007–2012) a montré une réduction de 52% de l'incidence des VPI physiques dans les communautés d'intervention. Désormais adapté dans plus de 50 pays.

-52%

Violences physiques entre partenaires intimes sur l'année écoulée (femmes) (2007–2012)

ARR 1.28 (95% CI 1.07–1.52)

Acceptation qu'une femme peut refuser un rapport sexuel (2007–2012)

50+

Pays adaptant SASA!

Programme SASA! de Mobilisation Communautaire contre les Violences Conjugales — Ouganda

Details

Maturity: Established
Promoter: Raising Voices
Period: 2007–present
Keywords: gender-based violence prevention, community mobilisation, intimate partner violence, HIV prevention, social norms

Context

SASA! (« maintenant » en swahili) est un modèle de mobilisation communautaire visant à prévenir la violence entre partenaires intimes, développé par Raising Voices et mis en œuvre par CEDOVIP à Kampala, en Ouganda. Il forme des membres ordinaires de la communauté comme militants qui font évoluer les normes sociales relatives au genre et au pouvoir à travers quatre phases — Démarrage, Sensibilisation, Soutien, Action — sur environ 24 à 36 mois.

Results

Un essai contrôlé randomisé en grappes à Kampala (2007–2012 ; Abramsky et al., BMC Medicine 2014) a constaté une baisse de 52 % des violences physiques entre partenaires intimes au cours de l'année écoulée dans les communautés d'intervention (rapport de risque ajusté 0,48) et une acceptation nettement plus forte du fait qu'une femme peut refuser un rapport sexuel (RRA 1,28). SASA! a depuis été adapté dans plus de 50 pays.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

C-NAPSE web research — accessed 2026-06-21
Raising Voices — accessed 2026-06-21
Abramsky et al. — BMC Medicine 2014 (SASA! cluster RCT findings) — accessed 2026-06-21
Prevention Collaborative — SASA! Programme Profile — accessed 2026-06-21
UN Women Asia-Pacific — Adapting SASA! Together (2023) — accessed 2026-06-21
ClinicalTrials.gov — SASA! Study NCT00790959 — accessed 2026-06-21

Attachments

Quality score: 100/100

How is this calculated?

Evidence: Randomised controlled trial

Top 1% in this catalogue (719 scored practices)

Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.

Evaluation

Evaluated by C-NAPSE

Score profile — the dimensions behind the score — how it's computed

Transferability / replicability3/3

SASA! has been adapted in 50+ countries across Africa, Asia and the Pacific; UN Women Asia-Pacific formally adapted SASA! Together (2020), demonstrating successful cross-regional replication.

Impact on gender equality1/1

The 2007–2012 RCT in Kampala found 52% lower past-year physical IPV in intervention communities (adjusted risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.16–1.39), per Abramsky et al., BMC Medicine 2014.

Effectiveness1/1

The programme achieved its stated objective of reducing community-level IPV acceptance and incidence; both primary and secondary RCT outcomes were statistically significant and positive.

Efficiency1/1

Training local community activists — rather than professional counsellors — minimises per-beneficiary costs and enables rapid scale-up, as evidenced by adaptation in 50+ countries with limited external funding.

Evaluated outcomes1/1

The cluster RCT (BMC Medicine, 2014) and the diffusion analysis (BMC Public Health, 2018; Wagman et al.) are peer-reviewed, independent evaluations registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00790959).

Sustainability1/1

SASA! has operated continuously since 2007, evolved into SASA! Together (2020), and remains the reference model in multiple UN agency GBV prevention programmes globally.

Achievement / evidence1/1

RCT documented 52% lower physical IPV incidence and significantly reduced violence acceptance in Kampala intervention communities (Abramsky et al., BMC Medicine 2014).

Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1

The four-phase model explicitly targets gendered power imbalances as the structural root cause of IPV, embedding gender analysis in every component of programme design and delivery.

Curator validation1/1

Evidence sourced from peer-reviewed BMC Medicine (2014) and BMC Public Health (2018), ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT00790959), and the independent Prevention Collaborative — all authoritative and verifiable.

Cite this

Evidoria. Programme SASA! de Mobilisation Communautaire contre les Violences Conjugales — Ouganda. Persistent ID: 004d1733-4ad9-417e-9dc0-560815f6e1e6.

Export as decision brief (PDF)

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 96

Norway's Alternativ til Vold (ATV) — Therapeutic Treatment Programme for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators

Norway

Europe's first therapeutic treatment centre for IPV perpetrators (Oslo, 1987), ATV now operates 15 offices in Norway. An NKVTS outcome …

★ 63

One Man Can — Sonke Gender Justice's Community Mobilisation Campaign Against Gender-Based Violence

South Africa

Sonke Gender Justice's One Man Can campaign mobilises South African men and boys through workshops and community action against gender-based …

★ 100

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts

Nepal

In Nepal's Kailali and Doti districts, Restless Development and UN Women ran a 2015–2017 peer-education programme against chhaupadi menstrual exile …

★ 100

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence

Sweden

Sweden's 28 Barnahus co-locate police, social services, prosecution and child psychiatry for child victims of sexual abuse. Evaluations show conviction …