Good practice

Programa SASA! de Mobilização Comunitária contra a Violência por Parceiro Íntimo — Uganda

Uganda · Kampala · See the Uganda profile

SASA! é um modelo de mobilização comunitária para prevenção da violência por parceiro íntimo (VPI), desenvolvido em Kampala, Uganda. Um ensaio clínico aleatorizado por grupos (2007–2012) registou uma redução de 52% na incidência de VPI física nas comunidades de intervenção. Atualmente adaptado em mais de 50 países.

-52%

Violência física entre parceiros íntimos no último ano (mulheres) (2007–2012)

ARR 1.28 (95% CI 1.07–1.52)

Aceitação de que uma mulher pode recusar sexo (2007–2012)

50+

Países que adaptam o SASA!

Programa SASA! de Mobilização Comunitária contra a Violência por Parceiro Íntimo — Uganda

Details

Maturity: Established
Promoter: Raising Voices
Period: 2007–present
Keywords: gender-based violence prevention, community mobilisation, intimate partner violence, HIV prevention, social norms

Context

O SASA! ('agora' em suaíli) é um modelo de mobilização comunitária para prevenir a violência entre parceiros íntimos, desenvolvido pela Raising Voices e implementado pela CEDOVIP em Kampala, Uganda. Forma membros comuns da comunidade como ativistas que transformam as normas sociais sobre género e poder através de quatro fases — Início, Consciencialização, Apoio, Ação — ao longo de cerca de 24 a 36 meses.

Results

Um ensaio controlado aleatorizado por clusters em Kampala (2007–2012; Abramsky et al., BMC Medicine 2014) constatou uma redução de 52% da violência física entre parceiros íntimos no último ano nas comunidades de intervenção (razão de risco ajustada 0,48) e uma aceitação significativamente maior de que uma mulher pode recusar sexo (RRA 1,28). Desde então, o SASA! foi adaptado em mais de 50 países.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

C-NAPSE web research — accessed 2026-06-21
Raising Voices — accessed 2026-06-21
Abramsky et al. — BMC Medicine 2014 (SASA! cluster RCT findings) — accessed 2026-06-21
Prevention Collaborative — SASA! Programme Profile — accessed 2026-06-21
UN Women Asia-Pacific — Adapting SASA! Together (2023) — accessed 2026-06-21
ClinicalTrials.gov — SASA! Study NCT00790959 — accessed 2026-06-21

Attachments

Quality score: 100/100

How is this calculated?

Evidence: Randomised controlled trial

Top 1% in this catalogue (719 scored practices)

Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.

Evaluation

Evaluated by C-NAPSE

Score profile — the dimensions behind the score — how it's computed

Transferability / replicability3/3

SASA! has been adapted in 50+ countries across Africa, Asia and the Pacific; UN Women Asia-Pacific formally adapted SASA! Together (2020), demonstrating successful cross-regional replication.

Impact on gender equality1/1

The 2007–2012 RCT in Kampala found 52% lower past-year physical IPV in intervention communities (adjusted risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.16–1.39), per Abramsky et al., BMC Medicine 2014.

Effectiveness1/1

The programme achieved its stated objective of reducing community-level IPV acceptance and incidence; both primary and secondary RCT outcomes were statistically significant and positive.

Efficiency1/1

Training local community activists — rather than professional counsellors — minimises per-beneficiary costs and enables rapid scale-up, as evidenced by adaptation in 50+ countries with limited external funding.

Evaluated outcomes1/1

The cluster RCT (BMC Medicine, 2014) and the diffusion analysis (BMC Public Health, 2018; Wagman et al.) are peer-reviewed, independent evaluations registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00790959).

Sustainability1/1

SASA! has operated continuously since 2007, evolved into SASA! Together (2020), and remains the reference model in multiple UN agency GBV prevention programmes globally.

Achievement / evidence1/1

RCT documented 52% lower physical IPV incidence and significantly reduced violence acceptance in Kampala intervention communities (Abramsky et al., BMC Medicine 2014).

Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1

The four-phase model explicitly targets gendered power imbalances as the structural root cause of IPV, embedding gender analysis in every component of programme design and delivery.

Curator validation1/1

Evidence sourced from peer-reviewed BMC Medicine (2014) and BMC Public Health (2018), ClinicalTrials.gov registry (NCT00790959), and the independent Prevention Collaborative — all authoritative and verifiable.

Cite this

Evidoria. Programa SASA! de Mobilização Comunitária contra a Violência por Parceiro Íntimo — Uganda. Persistent ID: 004d1733-4ad9-417e-9dc0-560815f6e1e6.

Export as decision brief (PDF)

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 96

Norway's Alternativ til Vold (ATV) — Therapeutic Treatment Programme for Intimate Partner Violence Perpetrators

Norway

Europe's first therapeutic treatment centre for IPV perpetrators (Oslo, 1987), ATV now operates 15 offices in Norway. An NKVTS outcome …

★ 63

One Man Can — Sonke Gender Justice's Community Mobilisation Campaign Against Gender-Based Violence

South Africa

Sonke Gender Justice's One Man Can campaign mobilises South African men and boys through workshops and community action against gender-based …

★ 100

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts

Nepal

In Nepal's Kailali and Doti districts, Restless Development and UN Women ran a 2015–2017 peer-education programme against chhaupadi menstrual exile …

★ 100

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence

Sweden

Sweden's 28 Barnahus co-locate police, social services, prosecution and child psychiatry for child victims of sexual abuse. Evaluations show conviction …