evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Saudi Arabia's DGA Web Accessibility Mandate — A WCAG 2.1 AA Rule That Independent Audits Show Government Sites Are Still Failing

Saudi Arabia · Riyadh · See the Saudi Arabia profile · See the Riyadh profile

Top 60% 64/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Saudi Arabia's DGA requires WCAG 2.1 AA on all government digital platforms, and HRSD and SDAIA publish matching policies -- yet a peer-reviewed audit found 441 violations and zero tested sites meeting even minimum WCAG Level A.

Details

Promoter
Digital Government Authority (DGA), with HRSD and SDAIA
Period
Mandate in force; independent evaluation study 2020
Keywords
digital accessibility, e-government regulation, disability inclusion

Description

Saudi Arabia's Digital Government Authority (DGA) sets binding accessibility guidelines requiring government and private-sector digital platforms -- websites, portals and apps -- to conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Agencies including the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development (HRSD) and the Saudi Data and AI Authority (SDAIA) have published their own accessibility policies referencing the DGA standard, with some committing to the stricter Level AAA.
Independent academic evaluation, however, shows a persistent gap between the rule on paper and the experience of users with disabilities. A peer-reviewed study assessing Saudi e-government systems from a visually-impaired user's perspective found 441 accessibility violations across the government services tested, with none of the sites meeting even the minimum (Level A) WCAG conformance level. Roughly three-quarters to four-fifths of the violations were Level A failures -- the most basic tier -- chiefly missing text alternatives for images and non-functioning keyboard navigation, both of which block screen-reader and motor-impaired users outright.
The case illustrates a common pattern in digital-accessibility policy: a well-specified, internationally-aligned mandate exists, but implementation and enforcement lag behind, and the people the rule is meant to protect are the ones who encounter the gap first. It is included here as an honest account of where standard-setting alone has not yet closed the accessibility gap, alongside the DGA's continuing efforts -- updated guidance and sector-specific agency policies -- to close it.

Read the full analysis: https://dga.gov.sa/en/Web_Accessibility_of_Government_Websites

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful