Pipiripau Produtor de Água — Payment for Protection of Water Resources (PPRH), Federal District, Brazil
Brazil
Since 2011, Brasília's water regulator ADASA and utility Caesb have paid producers in the Pipiripau basin to restore riparian buffers …
Rwanda · Rubavu · See the Rwanda profile
Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 77% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Rwanda's Water Resources Board ran a Rwf22bn (~$24M) cash-for-work programme (2019–2023) building terraces across the 286km² Sebeya catchment: erosion fell ~90%, potato yields tripled and 15,000+ were employed — though a 2023 audit found unpaid workers and unused terraces.
The Sebeya river catchment in Rwanda's Western Province spans about 286 km² across Rutsiro, Ngororero, Nyabihu and Rubavu districts. Decades of deforestation, poor agricultural practices and unregulated mining left steep hillsides eroding, triggering recurrent floods and landslides that displaced hundreds of residents.
From June 2019 to 2023, the Rwanda Water Resources Board (then named the Rwanda Water and Forestry Authority) led a four-year, Rwf22 billion (about $24 million) restoration programme funded by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, with IUCN, SNV Netherlands Development Organisation and local NGOs (RWARRI, APEFA) as delivery partners. Rather than a market-based PES, the state ran a cash-for-work model: local residents were paid to dig radical and progressive hillside terraces, cut trenches, treat gullies, protect riverbanks and plant trees, converting the catchment's erosion problem directly into employment.
By project end, over 1,500 hectares of radical terraces and 836 hectares of progressive terraces had been built (roughly 2,400 hectares, about 30% of the catchment), soil erosion had fallen by close to 90%, and potato yields on treated slopes rose from 8–10 to 20–30 tonnes per hectare. More than 15,000 people were employed, providing crucial income during the COVID-19 downturn.
The programme is also a documented cautionary case: a 2023 Rwandan parliamentary committee found that some terraces sat unused because of acidic soil or because labourers who built them had not been paid, and geomorphology researcher Judith Uwihirwe warned that poorly engineered terraces can trap water underground and destabilise slopes in this seismically active catchment — risks that any city or watershed authority replicating the model should design against.
National / regional programmes LIFE Programme
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Brazil
Since 2011, Brasília's water regulator ADASA and utility Caesb have paid producers in the Pipiripau basin to restore riparian buffers …
Burkina Faso
From 1980, farmer Yacouba Sawadogo revived zaï planting pits in Burkina Faso's Yatenga province, helping plots reach ~1,500 kg/ha of …
China
World Bank-financed terracing, afforestation and grazing bans across 1.56M ha of China's Loess Plateau (1994-2002) cut Yellow River sediment by …
Romania
Romania's PNDR Measure 10 pays 125–500 EUR/ha to smallholder farmers maintaining biodiversity-rich HNV meadows. Over 2015–2019, 212,413 beneficiaries received EUR …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.