evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Sebeya Catchment Restoration — State-Led Cash-for-Work Terracing to Protect a Flood-Prone Watershed (Rwanda)

Rwanda · Rubavu · See the Rwanda profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 84% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Rwanda's Water Resources Board ran a Rwf22bn (~$24M) cash-for-work programme (2019–2023) building terraces across the 286km² Sebeya catchment: erosion fell ~90%, potato yields tripled and 15,000+ were employed — though a 2023 audit found unpaid workers and unused terraces.

22 Rwf billion (about US$24 million)
Programme budget (2019–2023)
1,500+ hectares
Radical terraces built (2019–2023)
836 hectares
Progressive terraces built (2019–2023)
~2,400 hectares
Total terraced area (about 30% of catchment) (2019–2023)
~90% percent decline
Soil erosion reduction (2019–2023)
8–10 to 20–30 tonnes/hectare
Potato yield increase on treated slopes (2019–2023)
15,000+ people
People employed (2019–2023)
Sebeya Catchment Restoration — State-Led Cash-for-Work Terracing to Protect a Flood-Prone Watershed (Rwanda)

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Rwanda Water Resources Board (RWB)
Period
2019–2023
Keywords
watershed management, agriculture, land restoration, public works

Context

The Sebeya river catchment in Rwanda's Western Province spans about 286 km² across Rutsiro, Ngororero, Nyabihu and Rubavu districts. Decades of deforestation, poor agricultural practices and unregulated mining left steep hillsides eroding, triggering recurrent floods and landslides that displaced hundreds of residents.

Activities

From June 2019 to 2023, the Rwanda Water Resources Board (then named the Rwanda Water and Forestry Authority) led a four-year, Rwf22 billion (about $24 million) restoration programme funded by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, with IUCN, SNV Netherlands Development Organisation and local NGOs (RWARRI, APEFA) as delivery partners. Rather than a market-based PES, the state ran a cash-for-work model: local residents were paid to dig radical and progressive hillside terraces, cut trenches, treat gullies, protect riverbanks and plant trees, converting the catchment's erosion problem directly into employment.

Results

By project end, over 1,500 hectares of radical terraces and 836 hectares of progressive terraces had been built (roughly 2,400 hectares, about 30% of the catchment), soil erosion had fallen by close to 90%, and potato yields on treated slopes rose from 8–10 to 20–30 tonnes per hectare. More than 15,000 people were employed, providing crucial income during the COVID-19 downturn.

Conclusions

The programme is also a documented cautionary case: a 2023 Rwandan parliamentary committee found that some terraces sat unused because of acidic soil or because labourers who built them had not been paid, and geomorphology researcher Judith Uwihirwe warned that poorly engineered terraces can trap water underground and destabilise slopes in this seismically active catchment — risks that any city or watershed authority replicating the model should design against.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Rwf22 billion (about US$24 million) over four years, funded by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — June 2019 to 2023, a defined four-year programme.
Staffing & skills
Rwanda Water Resources Board (formerly Rwanda Water and Forestry Authority), IUCN and SNV Netherlands Development Organisation, Local NGOs RWARRI and APEFA, Local residents employed under cash-for-work

Conditions for success

  • Cash-for-work model converting erosion-control labour directly into local employment and income
  • Multi-partner delivery structure combining a government authority with international and local NGOs
  • Sustained four-year funding commitment from the Netherlands Embassy

Common failure modes

  • A 2023 parliamentary committee found some terraces unused due to acidic soil or because labourers who built them had not been paid
  • A geomorphology researcher warned poorly engineered terraces can trap water underground and destabilise slopes in this seismically active catchment

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes LIFE Programme

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful