evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Shire River Basin Management Program — Community Environmental Conservation Fund, Malawi

Malawi · Blantyre · See the Malawi profile · See the Blantyre profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 76% 33/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Malawi's Phase-I Shire River Basin Management Program (2012–2019) paid roughly 185 communities $1,500 each through a Community Environmental Conservation Fund to rehabilitate over 35,000 hectares of watershed and 4,000+ km of streambanks, though an independent evaluation flagged

185
Community Environmental Conservation Funds formed (2016-2018)
25,000+ hectares
Soil-and-water conservation area
~10,000 hectares
Forestry restoration area
35,000+ hectares
Degraded watershed rehabilitated (overall)
~350,000
Estimated beneficiaries
Shire River Basin Management Program — Community Environmental Conservation Fund, Malawi

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
Malawi Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development, with World Bank financing and Mott MacDonald technical support
Period
2012–2019 (Phase I)
Keywords
watershed management, soil and water conservation, community payments, hydropower protection, agriculture

Context

The Shire River drains Lake Malawi and supplies roughly 90% of Malawi's hydropower plus water for over 350,000 people downstream, but upstream deforestation and poor farming practices were causing severe erosion. Financed by the World Bank and implemented by Malawi's Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development with technical support from Mott MacDonald, Phase I of the Shire River Basin Management Program (2012-2019) ran a Community Environmental Conservation Fund (CECF) from 2016 to 2018, forming 185 CECFs and paying communities a fixed $1,500 grant for gully rehabilitation, riverbank protection, forest restoration and improved farming.

Results

Mott MacDonald independently confirms the programme delivered over 25,000 hectares of soil-and-water conservation work plus nearly 10,000 hectares of forestry restoration and more than 4,000 kilometres of stream and riverbank rehabilitation -- consistent with the World Bank's overall figure of more than 35,000 hectares of degraded watershed rehabilitated, reaching an estimated 350,000 beneficiaries.

Conclusions

An independent evaluation brief found early indications positive, with the CECF successfully motivating communities to act on their land-use plans, but noted candidly that the project has since closed and technical support ended, recommending a follow-up assessment to check whether rehabilitated land and community funds have persisted without that support.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Malawi Ministry of Agriculture, Irrigation and Water Development, Mott MacDonald (technical support), World Bank (financing), 185 Community Environmental Conservation Funds

Conditions for success

  • fixed $1,500 grant tied to communities' own village land-use plans
  • revolving fund with repayments recycled to sustain activity

Common failure modes

  • project has since closed and technical support ended; independent evaluation recommends follow-up assessment to check whether rehabilitated land and community funds persisted without support

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful