evidoria

What works in Slovenia

All catalogues

30
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
3%
strong evidence, of 29 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Slovenia

Drawn from: Empowered diplomacy: bridging the gender gap · Slovenia's National CAP Monitoring — Sentinel-2 Satellites Replace Most Farm-Subsidy Site Visits · The Women’s Lobby of Slovenia · IRSID Web Accessibility Inspection under ZDSMA — a Regulator Documenting Its Own Limits (Slovenia) · Improving Female Researchers’ Careers through Gender Equality Plan actions: Experiences from a Slovenian Research Institution · Ljubljana Declaration on Gender Equality in Research and Innovation · Gender equality. Equal role of women in science · Women's empowerment in the UN

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Efficiency +56 pts 100 here · 44 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +46 pts 83 here · 37 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +36 pts 83 here · 48 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Evidence of learning impact +22 pts 50 here · 28 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Scalability +8 pts 72 here · 64 average

Weaknesses

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -9 pts 22 here · 31 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Evaluation evidence -11 pts 33 here · 45 average

Curator validation -16 pts 58 here · 74 average

Equity & inclusion -19 pts 33 here · 52 average

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 44
Teacher capability & pedagogy
83 · 37
Transparency, ethics & data protection
83 · 48
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Evidence of learning impact
50 · 28
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Scalability
72 · 64
Transferability / replicability
65 · 59
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
56 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
56 · 50
Sustainability
83 · 78
Inclusiveness / equity
47 · 42
Innovation level
64 · 63
Transparency, fairness & accountability
53 · 54
Governance, certification & transferability
62 · 64
Evidence of impact / measured results
57 · 59
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Documented learning
67 · 74
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
22 · 31
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
67 · 76
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Evaluation evidence
33 · 45
Curator validation
58 · 74
Equity & inclusion
33 · 52

Coloured bar: Slovenia. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Slovenia's National CAP Monitoring — Sentinel-2 Satellites Replace Most Farm-Subsidy Site Visits · 87

The Women’s Lobby of Slovenia · 85

IRSID Web Accessibility Inspection under ZDSMA — a Regulator Documenting Its Own Limits (Slovenia) · 84

Slovenia's SME Digitalisation Voucher System (SPS / DIHS) · 71

AI4T Slovenia — National Pilot Trains 262 Teachers Across 73 Secondary Schools in AI-Aware Teaching · 67

AV Living Lab — Autonomous Mobility Testbed (BTC City) · 67

Vavčerji za digitalizacijo — Slovenia's SME Digitalisation Voucher System · 62

Technology Park Ljubljana · 62

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Slovenia concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Pikin Tab — Imagine Worldwide's Solar-Powered Tablet Learning Programme in Sierra Leone · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more