evidoria

What works in Ljubljana

All catalogues · Slovenia profile

29
evaluated practices
61/100
average quality score
4%
strong evidence, of 24 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Ljubljana

The Ljubljana Declaration on Gender Equality in Research and Innovation sets six priorities for gender equality in the European Research Area, prepared under Slovenia's EU Council Presidency in 2021. These priorities include fair and inclusive research careers with intersectional perspectives, Gender Equality Plans for institutional change, countering gender-based violence, and participative monitoring and evaluation. The declaration builds on Slovenia's Gender Equality Strategy 2020–2025 and aims to leverage synergies across complementary policy fields. However, the practice provides only descriptive detail about the declaration's stated priorities rather than quantified evidence of its implementation or impact.

Drawn from: Slovenia's National CAP Monitoring — Sentinel-2 Satellites Replace Most Farm-Subsidy Site Visits · The Women’s Lobby of Slovenia · IRSID Web Accessibility Inspection under ZDSMA — a Regulator Documenting Its Own Limits (Slovenia) · Ljubljana Declaration on Gender Equality in Research and Innovation · Gender equality. Equal role of women in science · Women's empowerment in the UN · Slovenia's Statutory Registry of AI Systems in the Public Sector · Slovenia's SME Digitalisation Voucher System (SPS / DIHS)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Transparency, ethics & data protection +31 pts 78 here · 47 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +29 pts 67 here · 37 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Evaluated outcomes +21 pts 100 here · 79 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Sustainability +10 pts 88 here · 78 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +8 pts 62 here · 54 average

Weaknesses

Governance, certification & transferability -8 pts 56 here · 64 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Evaluation evidence -15 pts 33 here · 49 average

Equity & inclusion -28 pts 22 here · 50 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Score profile vs peers

Transparency, ethics & data protection
78 · 47
Teacher capability & pedagogy
67 · 37
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 79
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Sustainability
88 · 78
Transparency, fairness & accountability
62 · 54
Evidence of learning impact
33 · 26
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
33 · 28
Transferability / replicability
65 · 60
Curator validation
78 · 73
Scalability
67 · 62
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
50 · 48
Inclusiveness / equity
44 · 43
Effectiveness
67 · 68
Evidence of impact / measured results
56 · 57
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
72 · 74
Innovation level
60 · 62
Impact on gender equality
67 · 71
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Documented learning
67 · 74
Governance, certification & transferability
56 · 64
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
33 · 48
Evaluation evidence
33 · 49
Equity & inclusion
22 · 50
Efficiency
0 · 33

Coloured bar: Ljubljana. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Slovenia's National CAP Monitoring — Sentinel-2 Satellites Replace Most Farm-Subsidy Site Visits · 87

The Women’s Lobby of Slovenia · 85

IRSID Web Accessibility Inspection under ZDSMA — a Regulator Documenting Its Own Limits (Slovenia) · 84

Slovenia's Statutory Registry of AI Systems in the Public Sector · 73

Slovenia's SME Digitalisation Voucher System (SPS / DIHS) · 71

Ljubljana Car-Free Historic Centre — Vehicle Restriction, Kavalir Electric Shuttles and Measured Black-Carbon Cuts · 67

ABC Accelerator — Ljubljana's Corporate-Backed Cross-Border Startup Accelerator · 67

AI4T Slovenia — National Pilot Trains 262 Teachers Across 73 Secondary Schools in AI-Aware Teaching · 67

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more