evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Spynka Early Childhood Centres - Free Childcare Enabling Ukrainian Refugee Mothers to Work and Study

Poland · Warsaw · See the Poland profile · See the Warsaw profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 66% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Comenius Foundation's fee-free 'Spynka' centres have served roughly 10,000 Ukrainian children and their mothers across 75+ sites in 8 Polish regions, training 200+ mostly-Ukrainian educators, though funding security beyond 2023 remains unresolved.

close to 10,000 children
Ukrainian children served by Spynka centres (by 2024)
200+ educators
Educators trained (90% Ukrainian nationals)
34,000+ children
Ukrainian children enrolled in Polish public preschools
12,000+ children
Ukrainian children in alternative/non-formal early-childhood services supported by UNICEF
75+ sites
Spynka centres operating (by 2024)
Spynka Early Childhood Centres - Free Childcare Enabling Ukrainian Refugee Mothers to Work and Study

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Comenius Foundation for Child Development (FRD), with UNICEF and Polish local governments
Period
2022-2025
Region (NUTS)
PL91
Keywords
early childhood education, refugee integration, childcare, labour-market activation

Context

Since Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine, over a million Ukrainian refugees have settled in Poland, most of them women with children. A major barrier to their labour-market entry was the lack of affordable, culturally appropriate childcare while they searched for jobs or studied Polish.

Activities

The Comenius Foundation for Child Development (Fundacja Rozwoju Dzieci, FRD), with UNICEF funding and support from the Polish government and EU funds, built the Spynka network of fee-free early-childhood centres, growing to more than 75 sites across eight Polish voivodeships. More than 200 educators, 90% of them Ukrainian nationals, were trained through 160 hours of initial training plus 120 hours a year of continuing education.

Results

By 2024 the centres had served close to 10,000 Ukrainian children and a similar number of mothers and caregivers. More broadly, UNICEF reports over 34,000 Ukrainian children enrolled in Polish public preschools and 12,000 more in the alternative and non-formal early-childhood services it supports. Parents report children 'playing more calmly' and settling in, though these are qualitative accounts rather than a formal outcome study.

Conclusions

As of the most recent reporting, most centres' funding was secured only through the end of 2023, with financial sustainability beyond that point explicitly flagged as uncertain by programme staff — a reminder that scaled emergency childcare needs a durable funding path to keep delivering labour-market benefits.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M) — Funded by UNICEF, the Polish government and EU funds; no specific budget figure is reported on the page.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Launched following Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine; grew to 75+ sites by 2024; most centres' funding secured only through end of 2023.
Staffing & skills
More than 200 educators trained (90% Ukrainian nationals), through 160 hours of initial training plus 120 hours per year of continuing education

Conditions for success

  • Funding from UNICEF, the Polish government and EU funds
  • Recruiting and training Ukrainian-national educators to provide culturally and linguistically appropriate childcare

Common failure modes

  • Most centres' funding was secured only through the end of 2023, with financial sustainability beyond that point explicitly flagged as uncertain by programme staff

Where it fits

Governance type
NGO-led (Comenius Foundation for Child Development) with government and international funding
Scale
national network across 8 of Poland's voivodeships
Income level
high-income (Poland, EU/OECD)

Commonly funded by

Philanthropic / foundation funding AMIF — Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful