Top 76%
in this catalogue (918 scored practices)
Scores cluster high, so position within the catalogue is often more telling than the number alone.
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced0/3
No carbon outcome data is reported for this monitoring system; it verifies compliance with payments that may include carbon-relevant practices but does not itself measure sequestration.
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced1/3
Indirectly underpins agri-environment-climate payments that can fund biodiversity-friendly farming, but no biodiversity outcome metrics are reported in the sources reviewed.
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control1/3
Land-use monitoring can flag conditions tied to water- and soil-stewardship payment schemes, but no retention, infiltration or erosion figures are cited for this specific system.
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced0/3
Not applicable — the practice concerns agricultural subsidy compliance monitoring, not fire risk.
Governance, certification & transferability3/3
Institutionalised through a structured, measured pilot (5,700 tasks, ~16,000 geotagged photos, ~70% inspector time savings) and scaled via a signed two-year, ~25,000-farm nationwide contract, with the pilot's source code shared with other EU Paying Agencies for replication.
Evidoria. SZIF's Satellite 'Checks by Monitoring' — Replacing On-Farm CAP Inspections Across Czechia. Persistent ID: 0b2799cb-d5dc-4b86-a648-0714a3065edf.