evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

The Eco-social water tariff in Dunkerque, France

France · See the France profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

80 m3/year/household
Vital-consumption tier threshold
1.29 EUR/m3
Tier 1 price (as of Jan 2023)
2.40 EUR/m3 (up to 200 m3)
Tier 2 price (as of Jan 2023)
3.18 EUR/m3 (above 200 m3)
Tier 3 price (as of Jan 2023)
0.50 EUR/m3 (70% discount)
CSS-beneficiary discounted price
72.1 %
Households in tier 1 (2023)
80 %
Households reducing bills after tariff shift
83-85 to 67 m3/year
Average household consumption change (2010 to 2023)
10 %
Groundwater abstraction reduction (2023)
10 %
SED cost saving vs previous tariff
180,000 EUR
Programme establishment cost (as of 2017 report)
40 of >1,800 expected households
Cheque eau uptake

Details

Maturity
Established
Keywords
Drinking water, Social justice, Eco-social water tariff, Governance

Context

Climate change threatens water availability, requiring efficiency gains, but higher prices risk denying low-income households the human right to safe drinking water. Dunkerque's water utility, the Syndicat de l'Eau de Dunkerque (SED), serves around 215,000 inhabitants; drinking water comes from groundwater over 40 km away (Audomarois) while surface water serves the area's intense industry, via two separate networks built in the 1970s. The former Nord-Pas de Calais region has one of France's highest poverty/social-exclusion rates (25.9% in 2022).

Objectives

As one of 50 local authorities in a national experimentation, Dunkerque introduced an eco-social tariff -- a metered, tiered water-pricing system aiming to (1) decrease water consumption and resource use, (2) raise environmental awareness via financial incentives, and (3) introduce automatic social discounts for low-income households, removing bureaucratic access barriers by using CSS/CPAM (health-insurance) eligibility data.

Activities

A three-tier pricing structure distinguishes essential from non-essential use: tier 1 (up to 80 m3/year per household) priced at 1.29 EUR/m3 (subsidised), tier 2 (up to 200 m3) at 2.40 EUR/m3, tier 3 (above 200 m3) at 3.18 EUR/m3 (all 2023 prices); CSS beneficiaries get an automatic 70% discount, paying 0.50 EUR/m3. In 2023, 72.1% of households stayed within tier 1, 25.4% reached tier 2, and 2.6% reached tier 3. Because the tariff cannot account for household size directly, about 1,600 households in collective buildings without individual meters (out of 36,000 area multi-family dwellings) and larger households could not benefit automatically; a 'Cheque eau' (12 EUR/year per person from the sixth household member; 40 EUR/year for un-metered collective housing) was introduced but drew only about 40 of over 1,800 expected applicant households, so SED is seeking data-sharing with the CAF (family allowance fund) to automate this as it already does with CSS data.

Results

A 2017 report (most recent cost data) put establishment costs at about 180,000 EUR (tariff design consultancy, meter installation, implementation planning), plus an ongoing 1.5 cents/m3 billing-system management cost. 80% of consumers saw bills fall or stay level; the remaining 20% (mostly tier-3 high consumers) saw increases. Average household consumption fell from 83-85 m3/year (2010) to 67 m3/year (2023); tier-2 consumption fell from about 90 m3/year (2010) to under 80 m3/year (2013). Groundwater abstraction fell by 10% in 2023, and SED saved 10% in costs versus the previous tariff. Tier-1 consumption rose slightly (from below 70 to over 75 m3/year), suggesting prior under-consumption by budget-constrained households, now able to meet basic needs more fully; one household in two fell below the previous system's break-even threshold.

Conclusions

The tariff is judged effective both environmentally and socially, redistributing costs so 80% pay the same or less while reducing overall consumption and letting previously under-consuming low-income households modestly increase use. A major awareness campaign launched before the tariff, and continuing in 2024 through cultural, sporting and school events, is credited with the programme's acceptance, aiming to inform users about water's origin/value, the tariff's rationale, and practical conservation habits. Persistent limitations include un-metered collective housing (16,000 households), inability to fairly account for large-household water needs (partly blocked by a data-sharing refusal from the relevant subsidy body, though a national regulatory decree is expected to mandate such sharing), and the failed opt-in cheque system, which has been abandoned. The first-tier threshold was raised from 75 to 80 m3/year in 2018 to cover more households. Post-COVID digitalised payment has been linked to rising unpaid bills, particularly among elderly and less digitally literate residents.

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes Own resources / municipal budget

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful