evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

The EUROSAI Parallel Audit on AI — 12 Supreme Audit Institutions Benchmark Government AI Readiness

Israel · Jerusalem · See the Israel profile · See the Jerusalem profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 22% 73/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Coordinated by Israel's State Comptroller, 12 EUROSAI audit institutions applied a shared 9-topic, 92-question framework to benchmark government AI readiness, finding ownership ahead of operational guidance and ethics still principle-level, not tested assurance.

12
Participating Supreme Audit Institutions (May 2024 - Dec 2025)
9 topics, 92+ questions
Shared audit framework (May 2024 - Dec 2025)
The EUROSAI Parallel Audit on AI — 12 Supreme Audit Institutions Benchmark Government AI Readiness

Details

Maturity
Pilot
Promoter
State Comptroller and Ombudsman of Israel (SAI Israel), for EUROSAI
Period
May 2024 – March 2026
Keywords
public audit, government oversight, AI governance policy

Context

Twelve Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) across Europe and Israel sought a comparable way to assess their national governments' preparedness for AI, rather than each auditing independently with different methods.

Objectives

Apply a single shared methodology so that a coordinated but 'parallel' audit (each SAI examining its own government) would still produce genuinely comparable, cross-country findings on government AI readiness.

Activities

SAI Israel coordinated the audit from May 2024 to December 2025 using a shared analytical framework of 9 topics and more than 92 structured questions, applied independently by each of the 12 participating institutions (Albania, Estonia, France, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, North Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Switzerland).

Results

The consolidated report, published March 2026, found that institutional ownership of AI initiatives is generally ahead of operational guidance, that ethics commitments often remain principles-level without testable assurance mechanisms, and that every examined government relies on third-party cloud providers even where national cloud environments exist, making hybrid delivery the practical norm.

Conclusions

The exercise demonstrates that a shared audit framework can produce comparable results across 12 different national administrations, but as a first cycle it has not yet been shown to change government AI policy in any participating country.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k) — A coordinated audit exercise conducted by existing public audit-institution staff rather than a technology deployment, implying comparatively low direct cost.
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years) — Ran roughly 19 months from the May 2024 launch to the December 2025 conclusion, with the consolidated report published in March 2026.
Staffing & skills
SAI Israel (State Comptroller and Ombudsman of Israel) as coordinating institution, audit teams within each of the 12 participating national Supreme Audit Institutions

Conditions for success

  • A shared analytical framework (9 topics, 92+ questions) applied consistently across institutions to keep results comparable
  • Sustained multi-year coordination (May 2024-Dec 2025) under a single lead institution

Common failure modes

  • First audit cycle, so there is not yet evidence the findings have changed any participating government's AI policy or practice
  • Full methodological detail and country-by-country scoring were not independently re-verified outside the EUROSAI network

Where it fits

Governance type
national supreme audit institutions (public-sector oversight bodies)
Scale
12-country coordinated exercise
Income level
mixed, high-income majority

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful