evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Toronto's Mandatory Green Roof Bylaw — North America's First, Now Repealed by the Province

Canada · Toronto · See the Canada profile · See the Toronto profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 32% 53/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Toronto's 2009 bylaw made green roofs mandatory on new mid-to-large buildings, delivering 1,200+ green roofs and 450,000+ m² of coverage, linked to ~11 million litres of diverted stormwater a year — until Ontario repealed it by order-in-council in November 2025.

450,000 m²
Green roof space installed (2010–2017)
11 million litres/year
Stormwater diverted annually
220 tonnes/year
CO2e avoided annually

Details

Maturity
Discontinued
Promoter
City of Toronto (Toronto Building / Environment & Climate Division)
Period
2009–2025
Keywords
building regulation, urban green infrastructure, stormwater management

Context

Adopted by Toronto City Council in May 2009, the Green Roof Bylaw was North America's first mandatory green-roof regulation, setting graduated coverage requirements from 20% to 60% of available roof space for new buildings by size.

Results

The City attributes roughly 420 permits and 450,000 m² of green roof space (2010–2017) to the program, with about 11 million litres of stormwater diverted and 220 tonnes of CO2e avoided annually — but Ontario repealed the bylaw by order-in-council effective November 2025, making green roofs voluntary again.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
City of Toronto Building / Environment & Climate Division

Conditions for success

  • Graduated size-based coverage thresholds with cool-roof or exemption alternatives for smaller buildings

Common failure modes

  • Provincial order-in-council repealed the mandate in November 2025 citing housing-cost concerns

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful