evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

tuss.io Decision Monitoring — Mongolia's Anti-Corruption Authority Uses AI to Flag Unlawful State Regulations

Mongolia · Ulaanbaatar · See the Mongolia profile · See the Ulaanbaatar profile

Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 75% 47/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Mongolia's Independent Authority Against Corruption uses the AI-powered tuss.io compliance platform to screen state orders, decisions, rules and regulations for legal violations and conflicts of interest — 388 reviewed and 152 revised, amended or invalidated over three years.

388 items
State orders, decisions, rules and regulations reviewed by the platform (2023-2026 (three years))
152 items
Reviewed items revised, amended or invalidated as a result (2023-2026 (three years))
tuss.io Decision Monitoring — Mongolia's Anti-Corruption Authority Uses AI to Flag Unlawful State Regulations

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Independent Authority Against Corruption of Mongolia (IAAC)
Period
2023–2026 (ongoing)
Keywords
anti-corruption, regulatory compliance, public integrity, RegTech

Context

Mongolia's Independent Authority Against Corruption (IAAC) uses tuss.io, an AI-powered compliance-management platform built by Tus Solution, to screen orders, decisions, rules and regulations issued by state organisations and officials.

Objectives

The system checks whether a decision meets legal requirements, creates unnecessary procedural steps, or gives rise to a conflict of interest or a conflict with existing law.

Activities

Rather than build a bespoke system, IAAC adopted an existing commercial compliance product, illustrating a low-cost route into AI-assisted oversight for a small anti-corruption authority.

Results

According to Mongolia's national news agency Montsame, as reported by the Digital Watch Observatory, the platform has reviewed 388 orders, decisions, rules and regulations over the past three years, of which 152 were revised, amended or invalidated as a result; IAAC's own website corroborates that AI has begun to be used in reviewing regulations but does not itself publish these figures.

Conclusions

The evidence base has real limits: the detailed monitoring statistics come from a single news report rather than an independently audited dataset, and neither IAAC nor Tus Solution has published how the platform's flagging criteria work or what happens to a decision once flagged.

Implementation

Indicative cost
Low (< €50k)
Time to results
Medium (1–3 years)
Staffing & skills
Independent Authority Against Corruption of Mongolia (IAAC), Tus Solution (vendor, tuss.io platform)

Conditions for success

  • Adoption of an existing commercial compliance product instead of building bespoke software, lowering cost and time to deploy
  • Applied specifically to legal/compliance screening of state regulatory decisions

Common failure modes

  • Flagging criteria and methodology not published by IAAC or Tus Solution
  • No disclosed appeals process or independent oversight of the AI's flagging decisions
  • Monitoring statistics come from a single news report, not an audited dataset

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful