evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Ukraine's Gender-Responsive Budgeting Reform

Ukraine · Kyiv · See the Ukraine profile · See the Kyiv profile

Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported Top 68% 52/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Ukraine's Ministry of Finance requires gender analysis in budget planning since 2019 guidelines; sex-disaggregated data is now published in all oblasts and 3,000 civil servants trained — sustained even through wartime, though local funding and skills gaps persist.

~3,000
Civil servants trained in gender-responsive budgeting
6
Oblasts extended to sub-national gender-budgeting (post-war recovery planning)
Ukraine's Gender-Responsive Budgeting Reform

Details

Maturity
Scaling
Promoter
Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, with UN Women Ukraine
Period
2019–present
Keywords
public finance, budgeting, governance

Context

Since formal guidelines in January 2019, Ukraine's Ministry of Finance has required national and, increasingly, sub-national budget programmes to include gender analysis, with UN Women technical support.

Activities

The approach has been extended to the sub-national level in six eastern oblasts as part of gender-responsive post-war recovery planning, reinforced by a 2025 law requiring gender-responsive budgeting government-wide.

Results

Sex-disaggregated data is now collected and published in all of Ukraine's oblasts, and roughly 3,000 civil servants have gained practical skills in applying gender-responsive budgeting.

Conclusions

Academic analysis identifies persistent barriers - entrenched stereotypes, low awareness, and insufficient dedicated funding - and notes wartime fiscal pressure risks deprioritising gender considerations.

Implementation
Indicative cost
Medium (€50k–€500k)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Ministry of Finance budget officers, UN Women Ukraine technical advisors

Conditions for success

  • formal 2019 guidelines
  • 2025 law requiring gender-responsive budgeting

Common failure modes

  • entrenched gender stereotypes among officials
  • insufficient dedicated funding
  • wartime fiscal pressure risks deprioritisation

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful