evidoria

What works in Ukraine

All catalogues

21
evaluated practices
68/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 16 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Ukraine

Ukraine has implemented several major digital transformation initiatives with measurable impact. The [Unified State Register of War Veterans][] has enabled over 300,000 people to access veteran benefits digitally, while [Digital Education Hubs][] grew from 3,000 to approximately 5,000 sites and reduced participants reporting below-average digital skills from 43.3% to 9.7%. The [ProZorro e-procurement platform][] cut single-supplier contracting from 11% to 5% and has generated close to $6 billion in documented public savings since 2017. Ukraine has also prioritized digital accessibility, with the [Digital Accessibility Competence Centre][] overhauling the Diia platform's screen-reader, contrast, and PDF accessibility features.

Drawn from: Unified State Register of War Veterans & e-Veteran ID in Diia · Digital Education Hubs (Diia.Osvita Library Network) · Diia's Digital Accessibility Competence Centre — Institutionalising Inclusive Design in Ukraine's e-Government Platform · ProZorro — Ukraine's Open-Source E-Procurement Platform Co-Built by Civil Society and Government · Ukraine's NACP Automated Verification — Risk-Screening Over a Million Officials' Asset Declarations · Gender-Responsive Budgeting in Ukraine — Institutionalising GRB at the Ministry of Finance and 24 Regional Administrations · Diia and Diia.AI — Ukraine's Digital State Platform and National AI Government Agent · Invisible Battalion — Advocacy Research Driving Military Gender Reform in Ukraine

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +55 pts 100 here · 45 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +50 pts 100 here · 50 average

Equity & inclusion +26 pts 78 here · 52 average

Demonstrated reach +24 pts 100 here · 76 average

Effectiveness +23 pts 100 here · 77 average

Impact on gender equality +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Scalability beyond pilot +15 pts 79 here · 64 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +13 pts 89 here · 76 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value +11 pts 70 here · 59 average

Achievement / evidence +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +9 pts 100 here · 91 average

Innovation +8 pts 71 here · 63 average

Weaknesses

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 42 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -14 pts 33 here · 48 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy -15 pts 22 here · 37 average

Curator validation -24 pts 50 here · 74 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -31 pts 0 here · 31 average

Efficiency -44 pts 0 here · 44 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 45
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
100 · 50
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
100 · 50
Equity & inclusion
78 · 52
Demonstrated reach
100 · 76
Effectiveness
100 · 77
Impact on gender equality
100 · 80
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Scalability beyond pilot
79 · 64
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 76
Evidence of impact / measured public value
70 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 91
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 91
Innovation
71 · 63
Transparency, fairness & accountability
60 · 54
Governance, capability & sustainability
67 · 64
Documented learning
75 · 74
Transferability / demonstrated replication
56 · 59
Sustainability
75 · 78
Evidence of learning impact
22 · 28
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 7
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 42
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 48
Teacher capability & pedagogy
22 · 37
Curator validation
50 · 74
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 31
Efficiency
0 · 44

Coloured bar: Ukraine. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Unified State Register of War Veterans & e-Veteran ID in Diia · 96

Digital Education Hubs (Diia.Osvita Library Network) · 96

Diia's Digital Accessibility Competence Centre — Institutionalising Inclusive Design in Ukraine's e-Government Platform · 92

ProZorro — Ukraine's Open-Source E-Procurement Platform Co-Built by Civil Society and Government · 91

Ukraine's NACP Automated Verification — Risk-Screening Over a Million Officials' Asset Declarations · 87

Gender-Responsive Budgeting in Ukraine — Institutionalising GRB at the Ministry of Finance and 24 Regional Administrations · 85

Diia and Diia.AI — Ukraine's Digital State Platform and National AI Government Agent · 80

Invisible Battalion — Advocacy Research Driving Military Gender Reform in Ukraine · 74

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Cities with evaluated practice

Where the documented practice in Ukraine concentrates — each city has its own evidence profile.

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Bogotá's Care Blocks (Manzanas del Cuidado) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more