What works in Kyiv
All catalogues · Ukraine profile
Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more
Strengths & weaknesses vs peers
Strengths
Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average
Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average
Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average
Equity & inclusion +24 pts 78 here · 54 average
Innovation level +22 pts 87 here · 64 average
Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average
Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average
Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average
Evidence of impact / measured public value +13 pts 73 here · 60 average
Scalability beyond pilot +13 pts 79 here · 66 average
Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average
Weaknesses
Multi-stakeholder collaboration -12 pts 67 here · 78 average
Transparency, ethics & data protection -17 pts 33 here · 50 average
Teacher capability & pedagogy -17 pts 22 here · 39 average
Curator validation -25 pts 50 here · 75 average
Inclusiveness / equity -41 pts 0 here · 41 average
Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average
Score profile vs peers
Coloured bar: Kyiv. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.
Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more
Top good practices here
Unified State Register of War Veterans & e-Veteran ID in Diia · 96
Digital Education Hubs (Diia.Osvita Library Network) · 96
Ukraine's NACP Automated Verification — Risk-Screening Over a Million Officials' Asset Declarations · 87
Diia and Diia.AI — Ukraine's Digital State Platform and National AI Government Agent · 80
Invisible Battalion — Advocacy Research Driving Military Gender Reform in Ukraine · 74
DOZORRO — Ukraine's AI Risk-Flagging System for Public Procurement · 73
Diia.City — Ukraine's Wartime Legal & Tax Regime to Retain Tech Talent · 62
Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more
Recommended to adopt or replicate
Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.
Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Backed by strong evidence
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100
- Rated highly transferable
- Addresses this place's weak dimensions
Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more