evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Ulaanbaatar's Raw-Coal Ban & Ger-District Heating Transition

Mongolia · Ulaanbaatar · See the Mongolia profile · See the Ulaanbaatar profile

Evidence: Quasi-experimental Top 83% 57/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Facing some of the world's worst winter air pollution, Mongolia banned raw coal for household heating in Ulaanbaatar's informal ger districts in 2019, cutting peak-winter PM2.5 by up to 45 µg/m³ — but a rigorous 2025 re-analysis found no significant child-health gain once COVID-1

17.1 µg/m³
Immediate drop in ambient PM2.5
45.3 µg/m³
Peak-winter PM2.5 reduction
51 %
ADB-reported fall in average winter PM2.5 (2016-17 to 2019-20)
81.6 µg/m³
Increase in peak-winter SO2

Details

Maturity
Established
Promoter
Government of Mongolia (Ministry of Environment and Tourism) & Ulaanbaatar City Governor's Office
Period
2019–present
Keywords
urban air-quality regulation, household energy transition, informal-settlement policy, public health

Context

Ulaanbaatar's ger districts house roughly half the capital's population in unplanned, non-networked housing reliant on individual coal stoves, and winter PM2.5 levels there have ranked among the world's highest, disproportionately affecting pregnant women and young children.

Objectives

With a policy-based loan from the Asian Development Bank, the government sought to cut particulate pollution by banning raw, unprocessed coal for household heating and cooking citywide from 15 May 2019, replacing it with subsidised semi-processed coal briquettes intended to burn more cleanly.

Activities

A peer-reviewed interrupted time-series study covering May 2016–December 2021 assessed ambient air-quality and child-health data before and after the ban, while the Asian Development Bank separately tracked its own results reporting against the government's air-quality target.

Results

The study found an immediate drop in ambient PM2.5 of 17.1 µg/m³, rising to 45.3 µg/m³ in peak winter months, with pre-ban median PM2.5 of 45.9 µg/m³ falling to 27.1 µg/m³ after the ban; the ADB separately reported a 51% fall in average winter ambient PM2.5 between 2016-17 and 2019-20, exceeding the government's 30% reduction target. However, once the study adjusted for the confounding effect of COVID-19 social-distancing restrictions, the earlier apparent improvement in severe child respiratory hospital visits was not statistically significant, and the switch to briquettes caused statistically significant increases in SO2 (+81.6 µg/m³ in peak winter months) and CO (+56.1 µg/m³ monthly in winter).

Conclusions

The case shows a real, well-evidenced particulate-matter improvement alongside a genuinely mixed public-health and pollutant-trade-off record once the data was analysed rigorously and confounders were properly accounted for.

Implementation

Indicative cost
High (€500k–€5M)
Time to results
Long (> 3 years)
Staffing & skills
Government of Mongolia — Ministry of Environment and Tourism and Ulaanbaatar City Governor's Office (policy implementation), Asian Development Bank (policy-based loan financing and results reporting)

Conditions for success

  • Citywide ban on raw coal paired with a subsidised, more cleanly-burning briquette substitute, so households were not left without an affordable heating option
  • International financing (ADB policy-based loan) supporting the transition
  • Rigorous independent re-analysis adjusting for the COVID-19 confounder rather than relying on the raw pre/post comparison

Common failure modes

  • The switch to processed briquettes caused statistically significant increases in SO2 and CO, an unintended pollutant trade-off
  • The apparent improvement in severe child respiratory hospital visits was not statistically significant once COVID-19 effects were properly adjusted for

Commonly funded by

National / regional programmes

Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.

Replication kit

Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Similar practices you may find useful

★ 95

Smart City Wien Framework Strategy

Austria

Vienna's long-term, legally-binding smart-city strategy (first 2011, updated 2019/2022) aligning resource conservation, quality of life and social inclusion with annual …

★ 95

Smart Open Lisboa

Portugal

Smart Open Lisboa (SOL) is a startup program focused on the validation and integration of innovative solutions meant to upgrade …