Pipiripau Produtor de Água — Payment for Protection of Water Resources (PPRH), Federal District, Brazil
Brazil
Since 2011, Brasília's water regulator ADASA and utility Caesb have paid producers in the Pipiripau basin to restore riparian buffers …
United States of America · Richmond · See the United States of America profile · See the Richmond profile
Evidence: Observational / pre–post Top 59% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice
Since 2005, Virginia's nutrient exchange lets dischargers trade nitrogen/phosphorus credits to meet Chesapeake Bay TMDL limits; in 2020 alone 316,330 lb N and 27,803 lb P were delivered with 100% compliance, though EPA warns poorly calibrated trades can blunt reductions.
In 2005 Virginia enacted Article 4.02 of the Code of Virginia, authorizing the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Nutrient Credit Exchange Program to help wastewater and industrial dischargers meet nitrogen and phosphorus load limits under the Chesapeake 2000 Agreement and, from 2010, EPA's Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load.
Let facilities meet their individual wasteload allocations at lower cost through plant upgrades, point-to-point credit trades, or payment into a Nutrient Offset Fund, rather than requiring uniform plant upgrades.
Facilities holding a VPDES general permit (now in its third term, 2022-2026) trade nitrogen and phosphorus credits coordinated by the Virginia Nutrient Credit Exchange Association.
In 2020 all 20 facilities that exceeded their wasteload allocations acquired sufficient credits to comply, with 316,330 delivered pounds of total nitrogen and 27,803 delivered pounds of total phosphorus sold through the exchange and direct point-source trades; 2019 volumes were similar for nitrogen (317,258 lb) and roughly three times higher for phosphorus (87,664 lb). The Exchange Association reports 100% member compliance in every trading year to date. Upgrading all members' treatment plants to meet the new limits was estimated at US$1.5 billion; independent economic analysis found trading could cut compliance costs by 20-80% relative to that baseline.
EPA's 2023 case study documents a structural risk: because exchange proceeds are shared among all credit generators, a glut of credit supply can push the exchange price below what a bilateral trade would fetch, creating an incentive to trade outside the exchange. The Environmental Integrity Project has separately cautioned that a poorly designed or weakly enforced nutrient trading program can undermine incentives for pollution reduction, or even produce a net increase in loads, if credit generation is not rigorously verified.
Reusable artefacts from this practice — as published by their sources.
Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
Brazil
Since 2011, Brasília's water regulator ADASA and utility Caesb have paid producers in the Pipiripau basin to restore riparian buffers …
India
Bengaluru's state development authority built a ~4.6-hectare constructed wetland to treat 10 million litres/day of sewage before it reaches Jakkur …
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan's Ministry of Ecology, with UNDP and $5.68M in GEF grants plus $11.4M co-financing (2011–2020), restored degraded land and forests …
United States of America
Florida's SFWMD pays ranchers near Lake Okeechobee, under 10-year contracts, per acre-foot of water retained and pound of phosphorus kept …
Open full copilot Grounded in cited practices — always check the sources.