evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Voluntary Algorithm Registration in Dutch Municipalities — What a 2025 Audit of the Ten Largest Found

Netherlands · Amsterdam · See the Netherlands profile · See the Amsterdam profile

Top 83% 40/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

The Dutch national algorithm register is voluntary: 291 entries by Feb 2024, and a 2025 Bits of Freedom audit found only 4 of the 10 largest municipalities supplied usable impact assessments.

Voluntary Algorithm Registration in Dutch Municipalities — What a 2025 Audit of the Ten Largest Found

Details

Promoter
Bits of Freedom (civil-society audit of Dutch municipalities)
Period
2022-2026
Keywords
algorithm register, transparency, municipalities, GDPR, DPIA

Description

Registration in the Netherlands' national Algorithm Register (launched December 2022) is voluntary, and municipalities decide for themselves whether an algorithm is high-risk. By February 2024 the register held 291 entries, led by Amsterdam (40), Utrecht (38), Den Haag (29) and Rotterdam (11), with about forty other municipalities listing 1 to 5 each (Gemeente.nu, 15 Feb 2024).
In November 2025 the civil-society group Bits of Freedom sent freedom-of-information (Woo) requests to the ten largest municipalities for the data protection impact assessments of their algorithms. All but two exceeded the legal decision period (four weeks, extendable by two); some took more than six months. Only four municipalities (Amsterdam, Groningen, Nijmegen, Utrecht) supplied documents usable for analysis, covering eleven algorithms: seven aimed at detecting rule violations such as benefit fraud and four at assistance such as early warning for debt problems (Binnenlands Bestuur, 22 Jan 2026).
Findings: municipalities without registered algorithms were found to use them; legal justification was sometimes sought after development; impact assessments were inconsistent and data protection officers' advice was not always documented; privacy statements rarely say which processes use algorithms. The researchers call for mandatory registration of high-impact algorithms and active publication of impact assessments. The case is a documented limit of voluntary transparency registers, not evidence of harm from any specific algorithm.

Read the full analysis: https://www.binnenlandsbestuur.nl/digitaal/grote-gemeenten-voldoen-niet-aan-regels-voor-algoritmes

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful