evidoria

What works in Amsterdam

All catalogues · Netherlands profile

13
evaluated practices
62/100
average quality score
23%
strong evidence, of 13 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Amsterdam

Amsterdam demonstrates a diversified approach to economic and social development across multiple sectors. International Newcomers (IN) Amsterdam facilitates skilled migration and foreign investment, with over 1,000 international companies using its streamlined procedures and foreign companies generating 32% of private-sector jobs in the Amsterdam Area (~230,000 direct jobs). Amsterdam Impact strengthens the social-entrepreneurship ecosystem, with average social-enterprise revenues growing from €693,771 (2015) to €1,151,305 (2017), and the programme investing roughly €2.5 million per four-year phase. amsterdam&partners Foundation promotes the region's reputation through the "I amsterdam" brand, reaching 1.5 million monthly website visitors and partnering with over 800 organisations across government, culture, business and research sectors.

Drawn from: International Newcomers (IN) Amsterdam (formerly Expatcenter Amsterdam) · Amsterdam Impact · DFROG — De Nederlandsche Bank's Machine-Learning-Tested Nowcasting Model for GDP Growth · amsterdam&partners Foundation · Amsterdam and Helsinki's Public Algorithm Register — the World's First City AI Registers · The Code To Change · Share to Teach Computer Science · FeedbackFruits — AI-augmented peer-assessment platform for higher education

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Inclusiveness / equity +48 pts 89 here · 41 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +24 pts 78 here · 54 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +22 pts 100 here · 78 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Innovation level +16 pts 80 here · 64 average

Transferability / replicability +12 pts 71 here · 59 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +11 pts 50 here · 39 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Scalability +9 pts 75 here · 66 average

Weaknesses

Governance, capability & sustainability -11 pts 56 here · 66 average

Evidence of learning impact -13 pts 17 here · 30 average

Documented learning -23 pts 50 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach -25 pts 50 here · 75 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Equity & inclusion -37 pts 17 here · 54 average

Impact on gender equality -83 pts 0 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Inclusiveness / equity
89 · 41
Curator validation
100 · 75
Transparency, fairness & accountability
78 · 54
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
100 · 78
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Innovation level
80 · 64
Transferability / replicability
71 · 59
Teacher capability & pedagogy
50 · 39
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Scalability
75 · 66
Sustainability
88 · 80
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 60
Transparency, ethics & data protection
50 · 50
Governance, capability & sustainability
56 · 66
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 30
Documented learning
50 · 73
Demonstrated reach
50 · 75
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Equity & inclusion
17 · 54
Impact on gender equality
0 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 84

Coloured bar: Amsterdam. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

International Newcomers (IN) Amsterdam (formerly Expatcenter Amsterdam) · 91

Amsterdam Impact · 91

DFROG — De Nederlandsche Bank's Machine-Learning-Tested Nowcasting Model for GDP Growth · 87

amsterdam&partners Foundation · 81

Amsterdam and Helsinki's Public Algorithm Register — the World's First City AI Registers · 80

The Code To Change · 76

Share to Teach Computer Science · 72

FeedbackFruits — AI-augmented peer-assessment platform for higher education · 60

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Liga Inan – Mobile Maternal Health Messaging Network · fit 89/100

  • Matches your scale
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Empowering Global Leadership: The Role of International Women's Forum Finland in Advancing Women's Leadership and Gender Equality · fit 84/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Matches your scale
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more