Taiwan's vTaiwan and Join platforms used AI-assisted opinion clustering to let citizens petition government (13,853 proposals by 2022, 10M+ visitors) — but sources document no major vTaiwan-driven decision since 2018, a rare well-documented success-then-decline case.
13,853
Proposals submitted on Join (by June 2022)
289
Proposals crossing 5,000-supporter response threshold (by June 2022)
>10 million
Unique visitors to Join since launch
31,115
Votes cast in 2015 Uber ride-hailing vTaiwan process (2015)
925
Pol.is survey participants, Uber case (2015)
1,875
Live-streamed final consultation participants, Uber case (2015)
6,100+
Menstrual-cup legalisation petition signatures (2017, within two weeks)
Details
Promoter
g0v civic-tech community with Taiwan's National Development Council / Ministry of Digital Affairs (Join platform)
Period
2015 – present (vTaiwan largely inactive for major decisions since 2018; Join platform ongoing)
Following the 2015 Sunflower Movement, Taiwan's volunteer civic-tech community g0v launched vTaiwan, combining the Pol.is machine-learning opinion-clustering platform with in-person stakeholder meetings to help draft digital-economy legislation. The government's own Join platform (join.gov.tw), launched the same year, lets any citizen submit a policy proposal; if it gathers 5,000 supporters within 60 days, the relevant ministry must issue a public response.
Activities
vTaiwan combines online Pol.is opinion clustering with live-streamed stakeholder consultation meetings; Join operates a threshold-and-response petition mechanism run by the National Development Council / Ministry of Digital Affairs.
Results
By June 2022, Join had received 13,853 proposals (289 crossing the 5,000-supporter response threshold) and drawn more than 10 million unique visitors. vTaiwan's best-known case, the 2015 debate over ride-hailing (Uber) regulation, drew 31,115 votes across its process (925 Pol.is participants, 1,875 joining the live-streamed final consultation); a citizen petition to legalise menstrual cups gathered over 6,100 signatures in two weeks and led to a 2017 legal change.
Conclusions
Multiple sources (MIT Technology Review, Daily Beast, Bertelsmann Stiftung) document that vTaiwan has not driven any major government decision since 2018, attributed to the absence of a legal mandate compelling government action, a cumbersome multi-platform user experience, and its shift from a government-civil society partnership to a purely volunteer-run effort -- making this a rare case combining well-measured early success with well-documented institutional stagnation.
Implementation
Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.
Commonly funded by
National / regional programmes
Indicative funding routes for practices of this type — always check each programme's current calls and eligibility rules.
Do you run this practice?
Claim it —
verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.
Data sources
Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.
The UK's Government Digital Service piloted GOV.UK Chat, a retrieval-augmented generative-AI assistant answering citizens' tax, benefits and visa questions — …