evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Waltham Forest Mini-Holland — Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and Segregated Cycle Lanes in Outer London

United Kingdom · London (Waltham Forest) · See the United Kingdom profile

Top 63% 62/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Funded with £30m, Waltham Forest built low-traffic neighbourhoods and ~22 km of segregated lanes. A 2016–19 natural experiment found ~22% less car use and more walking and cycling, but on small samples with wide confidence intervals and local opposition.

Waltham Forest Mini-Holland — Low Traffic Neighbourhoods and Segregated Cycle Lanes in Outer London

Details

Promoter
London Borough of Waltham Forest / Transport for London
Period
2014–present
Keywords
urban mobility, low traffic neighbourhoods, active travel

Description

Waltham Forest was one of three outer-London boroughs awarded about £30 million under the Mini-Holland programme (from 2014). Measures included traffic calming and low-traffic neighbourhoods (LTNs) in Walthamstow Village, Leyton and Leytonstone, dozens of 'Copenhagen' crossings with continuous footways, and about 22 km of segregated cycle lanes, including 4 km on Lea Bridge Road.
Evidence: a longitudinal natural experiment (annual surveys 2016–19) of residents who lived in the same area throughout found, for LTN residents, a 22% reduction in past-week car use and 43 fewer minutes of car use per week (wave 2), a 20% lower probability of owning a car (wave 3), and increases in walking (+115 minutes per week) and cycling participation (+68%) by wave 3. Earlier one-year findings by the same team reported about 41 extra minutes of active travel per week, and no evidence that cycling gains came at the expense of other active modes. A 2021 health-economic study reported £724m benefits against £80m costs.
Caveats: only 49–66 LTN residents per analysis, so confidence intervals are wide and the authors acknowledge uncertainty about effect size; Waltham Forest was the only borough with LTNs during the study. Reporting in 2018 identified flaws in public consultation and opposition from some residents, so the case is useful for both its measured gains and its engagement lessons.

Read the full analysis: https://findingspress.org/article/17128-low-traffic-neighbourhoods-car-use-and-active-travel-evidence-from-the-people-and-places-survey-of-outer-london-active-travel-interventions

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful