evidoria

← Back to browse

Good practice Imported

Zambia's Electoral Commission Strips 18,000 Duplicate Names from a 7-Million-Voter Biometric Register

Zambia · Lusaka · See the Zambia profile · See the Lusaka profile

Top 47% 60/100 · Ask Evidence Copilot about this practice

Zambia's Electoral Commission used biometric fingerprint/face matching in its 2020–21 voter drive to catch and remove about 18,000 duplicates from a 7,002,393-strong provisional roll, then opened public inspection windows for citizens to check their own records.

Zambia's Electoral Commission Strips 18,000 Duplicate Names from a 7-Million-Voter Biometric Register

Details

Promoter
Electoral Commission of Zambia (ECZ)
Period
2020–2021
Keywords
elections, biometrics, identity, public administration, electoral integrity

Description

Zambia's 2020 voter registration exercise replaced a manual, paper-based roll with a biometric system collecting ten fingerprints and a facial photograph per registrant, aimed at ending recurring complaints of duplicated registration numbers and inflated voter rolls.

In February 2021, the Electoral Commission of Zambia's Chief Electoral Officer, Patrick Nshindano, announced that automated biometric matching had already screened out approximately 18,000 duplicate or double registrations from a provisional register of 7,002,393 voters (53.4% female, 46.6% male). The ECZ then ran a public electronic-inspection window (7 February – 7 May 2021, accessible via USSD *214# and the eczovr.org portal) and a physical-inspection period (29 March – 2 April 2021) so citizens could verify or contest their own entries before the final roll was certified.

Public reporting covers the topline dedup and inspection figures but stops there: the ECZ has not published an independent technical audit of the biometric-matching algorithm's false-match or false-duplicate rates, so the 18,000 figure should be read as the Commission's own count rather than an externally verified accuracy measure.

Read the full analysis: https://zambianbusinesstimes.com/biometric-system-aids-to-root-out-18k-duplicate-registrations/

Implementation

Implementation detail (cost, timeline, staffing, conditions for success) is not yet available for this practice.

Do you run this practice? Claim it — verified implementers get a public contact pathway and can propose corrections.

Data sources

Where this practice's information was retrieved from, and when.

Attachments

Similar practices you may find useful