Browse practices
Catalogue: PES & Nature-Based Solutions clear
- Filters:
- Country: New Zealand remove
- Clear all
This selection at a glance
11
matching practices
9%
strong evidence, of 11 assessed
Evidence mix
Most practices in: New Zealand (11)
Results
| Select | Title | Evidence | Standing | Type | Location | Scale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Zealand National Wilding Conifer Control Programme | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 5% 73/100 | Good practice | Wellington, New Zealand | — | |
| Kopuatai Peat Dome Ramsar Wetland Management (Waikato, New Zealand) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 9% 67/100 | Good practice | Paeroa, New Zealand | — | |
| New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme — Forestry Removals (New Zealand) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 32% 53/100 | Good practice | Wellington, New Zealand | — | |
| Ōtākaro Avon River Corridor — Post-Earthquake Managed Retreat into a Floodplain Green Spine | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 46% 47/100 | Good practice | Christchurch, New Zealand | — | |
| Lake Taupō Nitrogen Cap-and-Trade — Waikato Regional Council's Water-Quality Trading Scheme | Evidence: Quasi-experimental | Top 46% 47/100 | Good practice | Taupō, New Zealand | — | |
| Rarakau Rainforest Carbon Project — Māori-Led REDD+ (Southland, New Zealand) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 46% 47/100 | Good practice | Tuatapere, New Zealand | — | |
| Fonterra–Department of Conservation Living Water Partnership (New Zealand) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 46% 47/100 | Good practice | Hamilton, New Zealand | — | |
| New Zealand Jobs for Nature — Mahi mō te Taiao | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 46% 47/100 | Good practice | Wellington, New Zealand | — | |
| Predator Free Wellington — Miramar Peninsula Invasive Predator Eradication (New Zealand) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 63% 40/100 | Good practice | Wellington, New Zealand | — | |
| Watercare's Hūnua and Waitākere Native Forest Catchment Protection (Auckland, New Zealand) | Evidence: Descriptive / self-reported | Top 80% 33/100 | Good practice | Auckland, New Zealand | — | |
| Biodiversity Offsetting under the Resource Management Act (New Zealand) | Evidence: Observational / pre–post | Top 90% 27/100 | Good practice | Wellington, New Zealand | — |