Top 22%
en este catálogo (719 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Transferability / replicability2/3
The statutory civil-penalty and rapid-removal design is well-documented and portable, though no other country's confirmed adoption of the exact model was found.
Impact on gender equality1/1
eSafety's own data shows a 960% rise in reports handled (849 to 9,060 annually) with 19,468 total reports over five years.
Effectiveness1/1
An 89.9% full-or-partial removal success rate on the 1,961 platform requests sent is a concrete, agency-verified effectiveness metric.
Efficiency0/1
Only 4 formal takedown notices were issued against 219 informal requests in 2024-25, indicating strained enforcement capacity relative to report volume.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
eSafety's own transparency reporting plus an independent peer-reviewed case study (Tandfonline, 2025) evaluate the scheme's operation.
Sustainability1/1
The scheme has operated continuously since 2015, was expanded by statute in 2021, and remains under active legal refinement in 2026.
Achievement / evidence1/1
A Federal Court-ordered $343,500 penalty against a named offender demonstrates the scheme carries real enforceable consequences.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1
eSafety data showing 99% of deepfake pornographic material targets women and girls grounds the scheme's design explicitly in gendered harm evidence.
Curator validation1/1
Sourced from eSafety's own transparency reports and media releases, an independent academic case study, and Australian news coverage.
Evidoria. Régimen contra el abuso de imágenes de la eSafety Commissioner — La respuesta legal de Australia al intercambio no consentido de imágenes íntimas y deepfakes. ID persistente: 27ee52f5-3165-4e0b-afcf-e85c81009e41.