Top 37%
en este catálogo (719 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Transferability / replicability2/3
The every-4th-seat quota design is a specific, replicable legislative mechanism, but its 2024 reversal provides essential cautionary lessons about the need for constitutional embedding.
Impact on gender equality1/1
UNDP confirmed women's share rose from 14% to ~20% in parliament and from 13.8% to 24% in local councils after the 2020 and 2021 elections.
Effectiveness1/1
Within its operating period, the quota measurably increased women's representation in both national and local elections, confirmed by UNDP 2022.
Efficiency1/1
A low-cost Electoral Code amendment produced significant representation gains within a single electoral cycle at minimal direct public expenditure.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
UNDP Georgia published a formal 2022 evaluation commissioned with NDI, UK and Swedish support, providing systematic analysis of outcomes.
Sustainability0/1
The quotas were abolished by Parliament in October 2024, directly demonstrating failure of long-term embedding — sustainability scored 0.
Achievement / evidence1/1
UNDP and independent journalists confirm: +6 pp national, +10 pp local representation — documented across two electoral cycles while quotas were in force.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding0/1
Subsequent repeal in 2024 demonstrates that gender equality was not embedded in political party culture or constitutional protections — gender mainstreaming scored 0.
Curator validation1/1
Multiple independent sources (UNDP 2022 formal evaluation, Venice Commission statements, Eurasianet, Civil Georgia) corroborate both gains and the 2024 reversal.
Evidoria. Cuotas Electorales de Género Obligatorias en Georgia — Avances en la Representación Femenina y Derogación de las Cuotas (2020–2024). ID persistente: 4a34cae7-1472-4ff0-b339-8c2d9125aa5c.