Top 32%
en este catálogo (660 prácticas puntuadas)
Las puntuaciones se concentran en valores altos, por lo que la posición dentro del catálogo suele ser más reveladora que el número por sí solo.
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced1/3
The BGF is linked to Oslo's 100,000-tree planting goal, but the cost-benefit study evaluated stormwater economics, not carbon sequestration, so the carbon evidence is indirect and unquantified.
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced1/3
Biodiversity is one of four weighted BGF scoring categories, but no independent study measuring actual biodiversity change on BGF-scored sites was found.
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control3/3
A peer-reviewed cost-benefit study of six blue-green infrastructure options in Oslo's Grefsen catchment found benefit-cost ratios up to 17.3 for wadi-based stormwater retention, directly evidencing the water dimension.
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced0/3
No source addresses fire risk; the BGF targets stormwater and vegetation, not fire resilience.
Governance, certification & transferability3/3
Introduced as a binding city norm in 2019 and since adapted into a Norwegian national standard with documented 2023 revisions, showing real regulatory uptake and cross-jurisdiction transferability.
Evidoria. El Factor Azul-Verde de Oslo — Una Puntuación Obligatoria de Gestión de Aguas Pluviales y Vegetación para Nuevos Desarrollos. ID persistente: 661f4624-d274-4fa4-a4df-d580b1527089.