evidoria

← Retour à la liste

Bonne pratique Importée

Programme de gestion communautaire des ressources naturelles (CBNRM) du Botswana

Botswana · Kasane · Voir le profil de Botswana

Preuves: Observationnel / avant-après Top 90% 27/100 · Demandez à Evidence Copilot à propos de cette pratique

La politique nationale de CBNRM du Botswana (2007, expérimentée depuis les années 1990) redirige les revenus du tourisme et de la chasse vers environ 100 fiducies communautaires couvrant ~22% du territoire national, avec une population d'éléphants en rebond, mais des cas documentés de captation par des élites, un partage inégal des revenus et une coûteuse interdiction de la chasse en 2014-2019.

80,000 elephants
Elephant population (1996) (1996)
129,000+ elephants
Elephant population (2014) (2014)
22 % of national territory
CBNRM/WMA land coverage (2004)
150 villages (10 districts)
Villages participating in CBNRM (mid-2000s (2005))
135,000 people
People involved in CBNRM (mid-2000s (2005))
200,000 USD
Chobe Enclave revenue (2002)
6 million USD
Lost licence fees during national hunting ban (2014-2019)
100 trusts
Active community trusts (present)
Programme de gestion communautaire des ressources naturelles (CBNRM) du Botswana

Détails

Maturité
Établie
Promoteur
Department of Wildlife and National Parks (DWNP), Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources Conservation and Tourism, Botswana
Période
1990s-present (national policy since 2007)
Mots-clés
wildlife conservation, community trusts, tourism revenue-sharing, benefit-sharing, conservation policy

Contexte

Botswana's Community-Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) Programme lets communal-area villages form registered Community-Based Organisations (CBOs) or Trusts that hold leases over Wildlife Management Areas and Controlled Hunting Areas, earning tourism and (when permitted) safari-hunting concession revenue in exchange for managing wildlife and other natural resources on their land.

Activités

Piloted from the early 1990s (the Chobe Enclave project from 1993 is an early example) and formalised nationally by the CBNRM Policy of 2007. Under the policy's revenue-sharing rule, 65% of proceeds from a CBO's sale of hunting quotas or concessions goes to the National Environmental Fund, with the CBO retaining the rest.

Résultats

By the mid-2000s roughly 150 villages across 10 districts and about 135,000 people (roughly one-tenth of the population) were involved, with CBNRM/WMA land covering about 22% of national territory by 2004. The Chobe Enclave earned about USD 200,000 in 2002, two-thirds from hunting. Elephant numbers rose from an estimated 80,000 in 1996 to over 129,000 by 2014 and have remained above 130,000 for roughly 15 years. CBO registrations stagnated between 2009 and 2012, and a 2014-2019 national hunting ban cost an estimated USD 6 million in lost licence fees affecting around 800 families before being reversed in 2019; pre-ban safari hunting supported roughly 600 jobs and about 15% of tourism revenue, with CBNRM-linked tourism overall estimated at about 3.5% of total tourism value. Around 100 community trusts are currently active.

Conclusions

Peer-reviewed and policy literature documents elite capture within some trusts, weak business capacity, and uneven distribution of revenue among members.

Mise en œuvre

Coût indicatif
Moyen (50 k€–500 k€) — Revenue-sharing rule: 65% of a CBO's proceeds from hunting quota/concession sales go to the National Environmental Fund; Chobe Enclave earned ~USD 200,000 in 2002 (two-thirds from hunting); the 2014-2019 hunting ban cost an estimated USD 6 million in lost licence fees.
Délai jusqu’aux résultats
Long (> 3 ans) — Piloted from the early 1990s (Chobe Enclave project, 1993); formalised nationally by the CBNRM Policy of 2007; national hunting ban 2014-2019, reversed in 2019; roughly 100 community trusts currently active.

Conditions de réussite

  • National CBNRM Policy (2007) formalising community leases over WMAs/CHAs
  • Revenue-sharing rule (65% of hunting/concession proceeds to National Environmental Fund) providing a consistent national framework

Modes d’échec courants

  • Elite capture within some community trusts
  • Weak business capacity in some CBOs
  • Uneven distribution of revenue among members
  • CBO registrations stagnated 2009-2012
  • 2014-2019 national hunting ban disrupted CBNRM hunting revenue, costing an estimated $6 million in lost licence fees and affecting ~800 families

Habituellement financé par

National / regional programmes

Pistes de financement indicatives pour des pratiques de ce type — vérifiez toujours les appels en cours et les règles d'éligibilité de chaque programme.

Vous portez cette pratique ? Revendiquez-la — les porteurs vérifiés obtiennent un contact public sur la page et peuvent proposer des corrections.

Sources de données

D'où proviennent les informations de cette pratique, et quand.

Pièces jointes

Pratiques similaires qui pourraient vous être utiles