Top 99%
dans ce catalogue (1071 pratiques notées)
Les scores se concentrent dans le haut de l’échelle ; la position au sein du catalogue est donc souvent plus parlante que le chiffre seul.
Evidence of impact / measured results0/3
Only two participants had been publicly named four months after launch, with no retention, employment or economic-impact data yet reported by any source.
Transferability / demonstrated replication1/3
The 'pay people to move here' incentive model is well replicated across dozens of US small cities (e.g. Tulsa Remote), but this specific dual-track (employer-linked plus independent remote worker) implementation has not itself been replicated elsewhere.
Scalability1/3
Eligibility is narrow (salary floors of $42,500–$60,000, minimum relocation distances) and the city itself is small (~24,000 residents), limiting the programme's reach even if fully subscribed.
Sustainability / continuity2/3
The programme is run by a standing economic-development authority with City Commission ratification, giving it more institutional continuity than a one-off grant, though no multi-year funding commitment is documented.
Innovation1/3
Combining an employer-side relocation subsidy with a separate independent-remote-worker track is an incremental but specific variation on the established small-city relocation-incentive model.
Inclusiveness / equity0/3
Minimum salary thresholds of $42,500–$60,000 explicitly exclude lower-wage workers, and no equity or targeted-access provisions are documented.
Multi-stakeholder collaboration1/3
Delivery involves only PCDA and the City Commission; no multi-stakeholder partnership (employers' association, state agency, university) is documented in available sources.
Evidoria. Programmes d'attraction de talents et de travail à distance de Ponca City. ID persistant: d86edaf3-9520-4670-8b2d-aae62f438d34.