Top 42%
dans ce catalogue (1069 pratiques notées)
Les scores se concentrent dans le haut de l’échelle ; la position au sein du catalogue est donc souvent plus parlante que le chiffre seul.
Transferability / replicability2/3
The statutory Gender Budget Statement model was extended from national to local government and is used as a reference by UN Women across the Asia-Pacific region, though documented variation across municipalities limits how uniformly it transfers.
Impact on gender equality1/1
Government reporting to the CEDAW Committee shows the gender-responsive budget grew roughly 3.2-fold between 2010 and 2024, a documented shift in resource allocation.
Effectiveness0/1
Peer-reviewed research found the framework burdensome to integrate, met with resistance from officials, and applied unevenly across municipalities, so evidence of consistent effectiveness is weak despite budget growth.
Efficiency0/1
No independent cost-efficiency evaluation of the Gender Budget Statement process was found.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
The Gender Budget Statement and Balance Sheet are legally mandated, produced annually, and independently tracked by UN Women and the CEDAW Committee.
Sustainability1/1
In continuous operation for 16 years since the 2006 Act, with expansion rather than rollback since 2010.
Achievement / evidence1/1
A near-quadrupling of the gender-responsive budget over 14 years is a concrete, government-reported achievement.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding1/1
Gender budget statements are a structural, legally required part of the annual national and local budget cycle, not a discretionary exercise.
Curator validation1/1
Findings draw on a UN Women regional report, a peer-reviewed journal article, and the UN CEDAW Committee's own 2024 review — three independent sources.
Evidoria. Budgétisation sensible au genre en Corée du Sud en vertu de la Loi sur les finances nationales. ID persistant: 32504895-dc5f-4b93-b421-47f7c5620a79.