Top 55%
dans ce catalogue (1069 pratiques notées)
Les scores se concentrent dans le haut de l’échelle ; la position au sein du catalogue est donc souvent plus parlante que le chiffre seul.
Transferability / replicability2/3
A 13-session group curriculum run through existing social-work and probation services is readily portable, though court referral routes proved weak in practice.
Impact on gender equality0/1
In the quasi-experimental pilot, BIP completers showed no statistically significant difference from the comparison group in controlling violence, so impact on violence is not demonstrated.
Effectiveness1/1
Of 119 men in Stages 3 and 4, 96 (81%) completed 9+ sessions and showed significant gains in violence and marital-relationship ratings, but the comparison group also improved on violence.
Efficiency0/1
No cost or cost-effectiveness data were published in the pilot report or the government reply.
Evaluated outcomes1/1
A quasi-experimental design with 54 comparison men, CTS-2/DAS measures, partner reports (80% compliance) and 6/12-month follow-up gives a credible, if non-randomised, evaluation.
Sustainability1/1
The pilot (2006–2008) evolved into a standing BIP casework service and, from October 2018, into SPeaR run by three subsidised NGOs across five clusters.
Achievement / evidence1/1
Reached 152 batterers via the BIP in 2016–19 and 242 male and female batterers via SPeaR in its first year, but only two court-referred men in three years via the Anti-Violence Programme.
Gender-mainstreaming embedding0/1
The service is gender-neutral (151 men and 91 women batterers in SPeaR's first year) rather than built around a gendered analysis of violence.
Curator validation1/1
Both an interim/final pilot evaluation and a 2019 government reply document the programme, including its limitations.
Evidoria. BIP du SWD et SPeaR — Services de conseil de Hong Kong pour auteurs de violences conjugales, évalués par un projet pilote. ID persistant: d87516c6-99df-4b81-9cd1-8738e3d084ca.