evidoria

What works in Funafuti

All catalogues · Tuvalu profile

4
evaluated practices
55/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 4 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Funafuti

The Tuvalu Vaka Cable documents that Funafuti benefited from the October 2025 Vaka submarine cable activation, which provided engineering headroom beyond 10 Gbps to the atoll. Tuvalu's National Digital Twin shows that in early 2024, drone flights captured over 1,000 geotagged images and identified more than 200 solar-panel installations on Funafuti, with machine-learning analysis detecting considerable coastline change between 2019 and 2024 imagery. Gender Action Plan in Tuvalu's Coastal Adaptation Project (TCAP) records that TCAP protected 2,780 metres of Funafuti's coastline against sea-level rise under a gender-mainstreaming framework, though no independent evaluation confirms whether employment and income targets were achieved. Predator Free Pacific documents rat eradication from Tepuka and Falefatu islets in Funafuti Atoll between July and September 2024.

Drawn from: The Tuvalu Vaka Cable: From 73 Mbps to a Connected Digital Nation · Gender Action Plan in Tuvalu's Coastal Adaptation Project (TCAP) · Tuvalu's National Digital Twin — AI-Assisted Mapping of a Vanishing Coastline · Predator Free Pacific — Nukufetau & Funafuti Invasive Rat Eradication (Tuvalu)

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Innovation level +16 pts 80 here · 64 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced +14 pts 67 here · 53 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Transferability / replicability -9 pts 50 here · 59 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Scalability beyond pilot -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -35 pts 0 here · 35 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -51 pts 0 here · 51 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Evaluated outcomes -84 pts 0 here · 84 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Sustainability (ongoing)
100 · 80
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Innovation level
80 · 64
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
67 · 53
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Governance, certification & transferability
67 · 66
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Transferability / replicability
50 · 59
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 60
Scalability beyond pilot
33 · 66
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 35
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
0 · 51
Efficiency
0 · 52
Evaluated outcomes
0 · 84

Coloured bar: Funafuti. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

The Tuvalu Vaka Cable: From 73 Mbps to a Connected Digital Nation · 76

Gender Action Plan in Tuvalu's Coastal Adaptation Project (TCAP) · 70

Tuvalu's National Digital Twin — AI-Assisted Mapping of a Vanishing Coastline · 40

Predator Free Pacific — Nukufetau & Funafuti Invasive Rat Eradication (Tuvalu) · 33

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more