evidoria

What works in Luanda

All catalogues · Angola profile

6
evaluated practices
46/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 6 assessed
{# KAN-370: every section closes with a one-line "what is this number" note + Know more. The note only names metrics actually shown — the strong-evidence tile hides when nothing is assessed (KAN-364 honesty rule), so its mention hides with it. #}

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Luanda

42 Luanda, Angola's free peer-to-peer AI and coding school, opened in July 2023 as one of Sub-Saharan Africa's first 42 Network campuses, received more than 4,400 applicants for its September 2023 intake and trains approximately 150 students per year across 21 curriculum levels in coding, AI, and related technical skills through a merit-based, teacher-free model. The campus, a presidential initiative run in partnership with the state oil company Sonangol EP, aims to provide tuition-free entry into AI and software skills regardless of prior formal education, using a facility equipped with roughly 300 computers. However, the available evidence covers only enrolment and selection numbers; no independent data on learning outcomes or graduate employment has been published.

Drawn from: Angola's Law 20/10 — Mandatory 30% Gender Representation in Parliament and Leadership Bodies · AGT's AI Cross-Referencing System — Angola's Tax Authority Flags 15,000 Companies for Fraudulent Zero-Revenue Declarations · 42 Luanda — Angola's Free, Peer-to-Peer AI and Coding School · MED–Dubai Digital School Partnership — Angola's 10-Province AI-Personalised Learning Pilot · Angola Digital Acceleration Project (IDEA Programme) · Audimus — AI Speech Recognition Automates Angola's National Assembly Transcripts

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

{# KAN-369 chips show whole points; the explanation lives in the section's bottom note (KAN-370) so each concept is explained exactly once. #}

Strengths

Efficiency +48 pts 100 here · 52 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Sustainability +20 pts 100 here · 80 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Equity & inclusion +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Weaknesses

Evidence of learning impact -13 pts 17 here · 30 average

Transferability / replicability -15 pts 44 here · 59 average

Scalability & sustainability -16 pts 50 here · 66 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability -20 pts 33 here · 54 average

Evidence of impact / measured public value -27 pts 33 here · 60 average

Governance, capability & sustainability -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Evaluation evidence -36 pts 0 here · 36 average

Documented learning -73 pts 0 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach -75 pts 0 here · 75 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding -90 pts 0 here · 90 average

{# Score profile vs peers (KAN-364, UX2.3): every dimension as place-vs-corpus bars — the full picture behind the strengths/weaknesses shortlists above. #}

Score profile vs peers

Efficiency
100 · 52
Curator validation
100 · 75
Sustainability
100 · 80
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Equity & inclusion
67 · 54
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Innovation level
60 · 64
Teacher capability & pedagogy
33 · 39
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 30
Transferability / replicability
44 · 59
Scalability & sustainability
50 · 66
Transparency, ethics & data protection
33 · 50
Transparency, fairness & accountability
33 · 54
Evidence of impact / measured public value
33 · 60
Governance, capability & sustainability
33 · 66
Evaluation evidence
0 · 36
Documented learning
0 · 73
Demonstrated reach
0 · 75
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
0 · 90

Coloured bar: Luanda. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

Angola's Law 20/10 — Mandatory 30% Gender Representation in Parliament and Leadership Bodies · 82

AGT's AI Cross-Referencing System — Angola's Tax Authority Flags 15,000 Companies for Fraudulent Zero-Revenue Declarations · 53

42 Luanda — Angola's Free, Peer-to-Peer AI and Coding School · 40

MED–Dubai Digital School Partnership — Angola's 10-Province AI-Personalised Learning Pilot · 40

Angola Digital Acceleration Project (IDEA Programme) · 32

Audimus — AI Speech Recognition Automates Angola's National Assembly Transcripts · 27

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Copenhagen Business Hub (Erhvervshus Hovedstaden) · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions
{# KAN-369: display the true 0–100 fit (rec.score) — gap_score is ordering-only and exceeds 100 by construction; the weak-gap boost surfaces as a reason line instead. #}

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more