evidoria

What works in Sarajevo

All catalogues · Bosnia and Herzegovina profile

14
evaluated practices
63/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 12 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Sarajevo

Sarajevo has hosted digital skills and gender equality initiatives: IT Girls' initial 4-day web-coding camp in February 2016 reached 12 girls aged 13–15, and the subsequent Schools of the Future strand expanded across 29 schools with 500+ students and 70 teachers trained in coding, Arduino, robotics and 3D design. The Young Men Initiative's Phase II (2011–2013) made compulsory school sessions on gender norms and violence prevention part of curricula in Sarajevo, with evaluation data showing students' disagreement with justifications for fighting rose from 42% to nearly 67% by endline. However, the available evidence does not specify how many Sarajevo students participated in these programmes or provide outcome data disaggregated by city.

Drawn from: IT Girls – Digital Skills Initiative for Women and Girls (Bosnia and Herzegovina) · Young Men Initiative (YMI) — CARE Balkans' School-Based Community Mobilisation Against Gender-Based Violence · ISOC Bosnia and Herzegovina's Barrier-Free Internet Programme for Blind Users · HJPC BiH's UNDP Gender Equality Seal — First Public Institution in Europe Certified (2020-2024) · Go Digital in the Western Balkans — EBRD-EU SME Digitalisation Loan-and-Grant Programme · WeMapp — Crowdsourced Accessibility Mapping and Personalised Routing for People with Motor Disabilities in Sarajevo · Status and Reparations for Civilian Survivors of Wartime Sexual Violence — Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina · Diaspora Invest — Bosnia and Herzegovina's Diaspora-to-SME Investment Bridge

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Teacher capability & pedagogy +63 pts 100 here · 37 average

Evaluation evidence +51 pts 100 here · 49 average

Impact on gender equality +29 pts 100 here · 71 average

Curator validation +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Documented learning +26 pts 100 here · 74 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +20 pts 67 here · 47 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +15 pts 89 here · 74 average

Transparency, fairness & accountability +13 pts 67 here · 54 average

Achievement / evidence +12 pts 100 here · 88 average

Sustainability (ongoing) +11 pts 89 here · 78 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +11 pts 100 here · 89 average

Weaknesses

Demonstrated reach -9 pts 67 here · 76 average

Inclusiveness / equity -9 pts 33 here · 43 average

Evidence of learning impact -10 pts 17 here · 26 average

Evaluated outcomes -12 pts 67 here · 79 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -15 pts 33 here · 48 average

Equity & inclusion -17 pts 33 here · 50 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -28 pts 0 here · 28 average

Governance, certification & transferability -30 pts 33 here · 64 average

Efficiency -33 pts 0 here · 33 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -48 pts 0 here · 48 average

Score profile vs peers

Teacher capability & pedagogy
100 · 37
Evaluation evidence
100 · 49
Impact on gender equality
100 · 71
Curator validation
100 · 73
Documented learning
100 · 74
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 47
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 74
Transparency, fairness & accountability
67 · 54
Achievement / evidence
100 · 88
Sustainability (ongoing)
89 · 78
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 89
Transferability / replicability
62 · 60
Effectiveness
67 · 68
Evidence of impact / measured results
53 · 57
Scalability & sustainability
57 · 62
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 6
Innovation level
54 · 62
Demonstrated reach
67 · 76
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 43
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 26
Evaluated outcomes
67 · 79
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 48
Equity & inclusion
33 · 50
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 28
Governance, certification & transferability
33 · 64
Efficiency
0 · 33
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 48

Coloured bar: Sarajevo. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

IT Girls – Digital Skills Initiative for Women and Girls (Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 92

Young Men Initiative (YMI) — CARE Balkans' School-Based Community Mobilisation Against Gender-Based Violence · 89

ISOC Bosnia and Herzegovina's Barrier-Free Internet Programme for Blind Users · 88

HJPC BiH's UNDP Gender Equality Seal — First Public Institution in Europe Certified (2020-2024) · 85

Go Digital in the Western Balkans — EBRD-EU SME Digitalisation Loan-and-Grant Programme · 76

WeMapp — Crowdsourced Accessibility Mapping and Personalised Routing for People with Motor Disabilities in Sarajevo · 72

Status and Reparations for Civilian Survivors of Wartime Sexual Violence — Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina · 63

Diaspora Invest — Bosnia and Herzegovina's Diaspora-to-SME Investment Bridge · 62

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 3 other places

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 4 other places

Karya — Fair-Wage AI Data-Work Platform Bringing Digital Income to Rural India · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

safe+natal — Comadrona-Designed Smartphone Checklist for Maternal Risk Screening in Rural Guatemala · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Digital Green — Video-Mediated Agricultural Extension · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Kartu Prakerja – National Digital Skills and Financial Inclusion Programme · fit 100/100

  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Already adopted in 6 other places

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more