evidoria

What works in Sarajevo

All catalogues · Bosnia and Herzegovina profile

8
evaluated practices
62/100
average quality score
0%
strong evidence, of 7 assessed

Quality scores are 0–100 rubric scores; “strong evidence” reflects study design; adoptions count documented replications elsewhere. Know more

Evidence snapshot for Sarajevo

The evidence in the CONTEXT block mentions Sarajevo only once, in the context of IT Girls – Digital Skills Initiative for Women and Girls (Bosnia and Herzegovina), which launched a 4-day web-coding camp there in February 2016 for 12 girls aged 13–15 as part of a UN Women–UNDP–UNICEF initiative to close Bosnia and Herzegovina's gender gap in ICT. The practices do not provide additional quantified results, demographic data, or other substantive evidence specific to Sarajevo beyond this pilot coding camp.

Drawn from: IT Girls – Digital Skills Initiative for Women and Girls (Bosnia and Herzegovina) · HJPC BiH's UNDP Gender Equality Seal — First Public Institution in Europe Certified (2020-2024) · Go Digital in the Western Balkans — EBRD-EU SME Digitalisation Loan-and-Grant Programme · Diaspora Invest — Bosnia and Herzegovina's Diaspora-to-SME Investment Bridge · Digital Content Creation Programme — ILO and EU Train Bosnia and Herzegovina's VET Teachers in Responsible AI Use · Bit Alliance — Bosnia and Herzegovina's Diaspora-Driven IT Export Growth · AI and Education – Challenges and Perspectives: Regional Teacher Conference in Sarajevo · Bosnia and Herzegovina's Fragmented General Forest Functions Fee

Generated from this place's cited practices only. Always check the linked sources.

Strengths & weaknesses vs peers

Strengths

Evaluation evidence +64 pts 100 here · 36 average

Teacher capability & pedagogy +61 pts 100 here · 39 average

Documented learning +27 pts 100 here · 73 average

Demonstrated reach +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Curator validation +25 pts 100 here · 75 average

Effectiveness +19 pts 100 here · 81 average

Impact on gender equality +17 pts 100 here · 83 average

Transparency, ethics & data protection +17 pts 67 here · 50 average

Evaluated outcomes +16 pts 100 here · 84 average

Multi-stakeholder collaboration +10 pts 89 here · 78 average

Gender-mainstreaming embedding +10 pts 100 here · 90 average

Weaknesses

Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced -9 pts 0 here · 9 average

Evidence of learning impact -13 pts 17 here · 30 average

Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control -18 pts 33 here · 51 average

Equity & inclusion -21 pts 33 here · 54 average

Governance, certification & transferability -33 pts 33 here · 66 average

Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced -35 pts 0 here · 35 average

Efficiency -52 pts 0 here · 52 average

Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced -53 pts 0 here · 53 average

Score profile vs peers

Evaluation evidence
100 · 36
Teacher capability & pedagogy
100 · 39
Documented learning
100 · 73
Demonstrated reach
100 · 75
Curator validation
100 · 75
Effectiveness
100 · 81
Impact on gender equality
100 · 83
Transparency, ethics & data protection
67 · 50
Evaluated outcomes
100 · 84
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
89 · 78
Gender-mainstreaming embedding
100 · 90
Transferability / replicability
67 · 59
Achievement / evidence
100 · 93
Evidence of impact / measured results
67 · 60
Scalability & sustainability
67 · 66
Sustainability (ongoing)
80 · 80
Innovation level
57 · 64
Inclusiveness / equity
33 · 41
Fire resilience — risk reduction, evidenced
0 · 9
Evidence of learning impact
17 · 30
Water & soil — retention, infiltration, erosion control
33 · 51
Equity & inclusion
33 · 54
Governance, certification & transferability
33 · 66
Carbon — sequestration / storage, evidenced
0 · 35
Efficiency
0 · 52
Biodiversity — conservation / improvement, evidenced
0 · 53

Coloured bar: Sarajevo. Grey bar: peer average across the corpus. Both on a common 0–100 scale.

Points compare this place's average on each dimension with the average across all evaluated places, on a common 0–100 scale. Know more

Top good practices here

IT Girls – Digital Skills Initiative for Women and Girls (Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 92

HJPC BiH's UNDP Gender Equality Seal — First Public Institution in Europe Certified (2020-2024) · 85

Go Digital in the Western Balkans — EBRD-EU SME Digitalisation Loan-and-Grant Programme · 76

Diaspora Invest — Bosnia and Herzegovina's Diaspora-to-SME Investment Bridge · 62

Digital Content Creation Programme — ILO and EU Train Bosnia and Herzegovina's VET Teachers in Responsible AI Use · 60

Bit Alliance — Bosnia and Herzegovina's Diaspora-Driven IT Export Growth · 57

AI and Education – Challenges and Perspectives: Regional Teacher Conference in Sarajevo · 47

Bosnia and Herzegovina's Fragmented General Forest Functions Fee · 13

Each number is the practice's overall 0–100 quality score against its catalogue's rubric. Know more

Recommended to adopt or replicate

Transferable practices from elsewhere that address this place's gaps.

Ciudad Mujer — El Salvador's Integrated Women's Services Programme · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

SASA! Community Mobilisation Programme against Intimate Partner Violence — Uganda · fit 100/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Rwanda's Land Tenure Regularization Programme — Titling Land in Women's Names · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Sweden's Barnahus (Children's House) — Multidisciplinary One-Stop Centres for Child Victims of Sexual Abuse and Violence · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Stadtidee Aarau — Switzerland's First City-Wide Participatory Budget Using the Method of Equal Shares · fit 90/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Backed by strong evidence
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Abolition of Chhaupadi — Ending Menstrual Exile Huts in Nepal's Far- and Mid-Western Districts · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Guyana's One-Third Gender Candidate Quota — Two Decades of Sustained Representation · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Serbia's 40% Electoral Gender Quota — From One-in-Three to Near-Parity Party Lists (2020-2025) · fit 82/100

  • Rated highly transferable
  • Addresses this place's weak dimensions

Fit estimates how well a practice matches this place, 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent); the list is ordered to favour practices that address this place's gaps. Know more